CVE-2001-1377
UnknownEPSS 5.42%
Last modified
CVE-2001-1377 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. Multiple RADIUS implementations do not properly validate the Vendor-Length of the Vendor-Specific attribute, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a Vendor-Length that is less than 2.. EPSS estimates a 5.42% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
Multiple RADIUS implementations do not properly validate the Vendor-Length of the Vendor-Specific attribute, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a Vendor-Length that is less than 2.
Metrics
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Freeradius | Freeradius | 0.2 |
| Freeradius | Freeradius | 0.3 |
| Gnu | Radius | 0.92.1 |
| Gnu | Radius | 0.93 |
| Gnu | Radius | 0.94 |
| Gnu | Radius | 0.95 |
| Icradius | Icradius | 0.14 |
| Icradius | Icradius | 0.15 |
| Icradius | Icradius | 0.16 |
| Icradius | Icradius | 0.17 |
| Icradius | Icradius | 0.17b |
| Icradius | Icradius | 0.18 |
| Icradius | Icradius | 0.18.1 |
| Livingston | Radius | 2.0 |
| Livingston | Radius | 2.0.1 |
| Livingston | Radius | 2.1 |
| Lucent | Radius | 2.0 |
| Lucent | Radius | 2.0.1 |
| Lucent | Radius | 2.1 |
| Miquel Van Smoorenburg Cistron | Radius | 1.6.1 |
| Miquel Van Smoorenburg Cistron | Radius | 1.6.2 |
| Miquel Van Smoorenburg Cistron | Radius | 1.6.3 |
| Miquel Van Smoorenburg Cistron | Radius | 1.6.4 |
| Miquel Van Smoorenburg Cistron | Radius | 1.6.5 |
| Miquel Van Smoorenburg Cistron | Radius | 1.6_.0 |
| Openradius | Openradius | 0.8 |
| Openradius | Openradius | 0.9 |
| Openradius | Openradius | 0.9.1 |
| Openradius | Openradius | 0.9.2 |
| Openradius | Openradius | 0.9.3 |
| Radiusclient | Radiusclient | 0.3.1 |
| Xtradius | Xtradius | 1.1_pre1 |
| Xtradius | Xtradius | 1.1_pre2 |
| Yard Radius | Yard Radius | 1.0.17 |
| Yard Radius | Yard Radius | 1.0.18 |
| Yard Radius | Yard Radius | 1.0.19 |
| Yard Radius | Yard Radius | 1.0_pre13 |
| Yard Radius | Yard Radius | 1.0_pre14 |
| Yard Radius | Yard Radius | 1.0_pre15 |
| Yard Radius Project | Yard Radius | 1.0.16 |
References
- http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-06.htmlPatch, Third Party Advisory, US Government Resource
- http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/8354.phpPatch, Vendor Advisory
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/936683Patch, Third Party Advisory, US Government Resource
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/4230Patch, Vendor Advisory
- http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-06.htmlPatch, Third Party Advisory, US Government Resource
- http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/8354.phpPatch, Vendor Advisory
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/936683Patch, Third Party Advisory, US Government Resource
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/4230Patch, Vendor Advisory
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2001-1377?
Multiple RADIUS implementations do not properly validate the Vendor-Length of the Vendor-Specific attribute, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a Vendor-Length that is less than 2.
How severe is CVE-2001-1377?
Severity scoring for CVE-2001-1377 is pending analysis. The EPSS model estimates a 5.42% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
How do I fix CVE-2001-1377?
Check the vendor references and advisories linked above for patched versions and mitigation guidance. You can also run a Strix scan to test if your systems are affected.
Are you affected by CVE-2001-1377?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST