CVE-2009-0835
Last modified
CVE-2009-0835 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. The __secure_computing function in kernel/seccomp.c in the seccomp subsystem in the Linux kernel 2.6.28.7 and earlier on the x86_64 platform, when CONFIG_SECCOMP is enabled, does not properly handle (1) a 32-bit process making a 64-bit syscall or (2) a 64-bit process making a 32-bit syscall, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted syscalls that are misinterpreted as (a) stat or (b) chmod, a related issue to CVE-2009-0342 and CVE-2009-0343.. EPSS estimates a 0.93% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
The __secure_computing function in kernel/seccomp.c in the seccomp subsystem in the Linux kernel 2.6.28.7 and earlier on the x86_64 platform, when CONFIG_SECCOMP is enabled, does not properly handle (1) a 32-bit process making a 64-bit syscall or (2) a 64-bit process making a 32-bit syscall, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted syscalls that are misinterpreted as (a) stat or (b) chmod, a related issue to CVE-2009-0342 and CVE-2009-0343.
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 2.6.25 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 2.6.25.1 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 2.6.25.2 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 2.6.25.3 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 2.6.25.4 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 2.6.25.5 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 2.6.25.6 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 2.6.25.7 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 2.6.25.8 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 2.6.25.9 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 2.6.25.10 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 2.6.25.11 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 2.6.25.12 |
References
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34084Vendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34917Vendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35121Vendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35185Vendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35390Vendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35394Vendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34084Vendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34917Vendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35121Vendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35185Vendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35390Vendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35394Vendor Advisory
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2009-0835?
How severe is CVE-2009-0835?
How do I fix CVE-2009-0835?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2009
- CVE-2009-0829Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in QuoteBook allow re…
- CVE-2009-0830Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in QuoteBook allows…
- CVE-2009-0831SQL injection vulnerability in members.php in the Members CV…
- CVE-2009-0832SQL injection vulnerability in items.php in the E-Cart modul…
- CVE-2009-0833Heap-based buffer overflow in gen_msn.dll in the gen_msn plu…
- CVE-2009-0834The audit_syscall_entry function in the Linux kernel 2.6.28.…
- CVE-2009-0836Foxit Reader 2.3 before Build 3902 and 3.0 before Build 1506…
- CVE-2009-0837Stack-based buffer overflow in Foxit Reader 3.0 before Build…
- CVE-2009-0838The crypto pseudo device driver in Sun Solaris 10, and OpenS…
- CVE-2009-0839Stack-based buffer overflow in mapserv.c in mapserv in MapSe…
- CVE-2009-0840Heap-based buffer underflow in the readPostBody function in …
- CVE-2009-0841Directory traversal vulnerability in mapserv.c in mapserv in…
Are you affected by CVE-2009-0835?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
