CVE-2009-3245
Last modified
CVE-2009-3245 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. OpenSSL before 0.9.8m does not check for a NULL return value from bn_wexpand function calls in (1) crypto/bn/bn_div.c, (2) crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c, (3) crypto/ec/ec2_smpl.c, and (4) engines/e_ubsec.c, which has unspecified impact and context-dependent attack vectors.. EPSS estimates a 6.73% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
OpenSSL before 0.9.8m does not check for a NULL return value from bn_wexpand function calls in (1) crypto/bn/bn_div.c, (2) crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c, (3) crypto/ec/ec2_smpl.c, and (4) engines/e_ubsec.c, which has unspecified impact and context-dependent attack vectors.
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Openssl | Openssl | <= 0.9.8l |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8 |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8a |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8b |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8c |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8d |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8e |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8f |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8g |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8h |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8i |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8j |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8k |
References
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38761Vendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38761Vendor Advisory
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2009-3245?
How severe is CVE-2009-3245?
How do I fix CVE-2009-3245?
Are you affected by CVE-2009-3245?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
