CVE-2010-1224
Last modified
CVE-2010-1224 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. main/acl.c in Asterisk Open Source 1.6.0.x before 1.6.0.25, 1.6.1.x before 1.6.1.17, and 1.6.2.x before 1.6.2.5 does not properly enforce remote host access controls when CIDR notation "/0" is used in permit= and deny= configuration rules, which causes an improper arithmetic shift and might allow remote attackers to bypass ACL rules and access services from unauthorized hosts.. EPSS estimates a 3.55% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
main/acl.c in Asterisk Open Source 1.6.0.x before 1.6.0.25, 1.6.1.x before 1.6.1.17, and 1.6.2.x before 1.6.2.5 does not properly enforce remote host access controls when CIDR notation "/0" is used in permit= and deny= configuration rules, which causes an improper arithmetic shift and might allow remote attackers to bypass ACL rules and access services from unauthorized hosts.
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Update |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.1 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.2 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.3 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.5 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.6 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.7 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.8 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.9 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.10 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.12 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.13 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.14 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.15 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.16 | Rc1 |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.17 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.18 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.19 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.20 | Rc1 |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.21 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.22 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.23 | Rc2 |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.0.24 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.1 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.1.1 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.1.2 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.1.4 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.1.5 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.1.6 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.1.7 | Rc1 |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.1.8 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.1.9 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.1.10 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.1.11 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.1.12 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.1.13 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.1.14 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.1.15 | Rc2 |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.1.16 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.2.0 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.2.1 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.2.2 | — |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.2.3 | Rc2 |
| Digium | Asterisk | 1.6.2.4 | — |
References
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38752Vendor Advisory
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0475Vendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38752Vendor Advisory
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0475Vendor Advisory
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2010-1224?
How severe is CVE-2010-1224?
How do I fix CVE-2010-1224?
Are you affected by CVE-2010-1224?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST