CVE-2011-1089
Last modified
CVE-2011-1089 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. The addmntent function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.13 and earlier does not report an error status for failed attempts to write to the /etc/mtab file, which makes it easier for local users to trigger corruption of this file, as demonstrated by writes from a process with a small RLIMIT_FSIZE value, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0296.. EPSS estimates a 0.42% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
The addmntent function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.13 and earlier does not report an error status for failed attempts to write to the /etc/mtab file, which makes it easier for local users to trigger corruption of this file, as demonstrated by writes from a process with a small RLIMIT_FSIZE value, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0296.
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Gnu | Glibc | <= 2.13 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 1.00 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 1.01 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 1.02 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 1.03 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 1.04 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 1.05 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 1.06 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 1.07 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 1.08 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 1.09 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 1.09.1 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.0 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.0.1 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.0.2 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.0.3 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.0.4 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.0.5 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.0.6 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.1 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.1.1 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.1.1.6 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.1.2 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.1.3 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.1.3.10 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.1.9 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.2 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.2.1 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.2.2 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.2.3 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.2.4 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.2.5 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.3 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.3.1 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.3.2 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.3.3 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.3.4 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.3.5 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.3.6 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.3.10 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.4 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.5 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.5.1 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.6 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.6.1 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.7 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.8 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.9 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.10 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.10.1 |
Showing 50 of 58 affected configurations. See NVD for the full list.
References
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/10Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/11Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/12Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/9Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/05/3Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/05/7Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/07/9Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/16Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/5Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/7Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/15/6Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/22/4Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/22/6Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/31/3Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/31/4Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/04/01/2Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12625Issue Tracking
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-1526.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46740Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688980Issue Tracking
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/10Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/11Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/12Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/9Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/05/3Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/05/7Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/07/9Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/16Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/5Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/7Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/15/6Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/22/4Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/22/6Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/31/3Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/31/4Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/04/01/2Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12625Issue Tracking
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-1526.htmlThird Party Advisory
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46740Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688980Issue Tracking
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2011-1089?
How severe is CVE-2011-1089?
How do I fix CVE-2011-1089?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2011
- CVE-2011-1083The epoll implementation in the Linux kernel 2.6.37.2 and ea…
- CVE-2011-1084A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Smoothwall Exp…6.1
- CVE-2011-1085CSRF vulnerability in Smoothwall Express 3.8.8
- CVE-2011-1086Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in admin/system.htm…6.1
- CVE-2011-1087Buffer overflow in VideoLAN VLC media player 1.0.5 allows us…
- CVE-2011-1088Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.10 does not follow ServletSecur…
- CVE-2011-1090The __nfs4_proc_set_acl function in fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c in the…
- CVE-2011-1091libymsg.c in the Yahoo! protocol plugin in libpurple in Pidg…
- CVE-2011-1092Integer overflow in ext/shmop/shmop.c in PHP before 5.3.6 al…
- CVE-2011-1093The dccp_rcv_state_process function in net/dccp/input.c in t…
- CVE-2011-1094kio/kio/tcpslavebase.cpp in KDE KSSL in kdelibs before 4.6.1…
- CVE-2011-1095locale/programs/locale.c in locale in the GNU C Library (aka…
Are you affected by CVE-2011-1089?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
