CVE-2014-7817
UnknownEPSS 0.58%
Last modified
CVE-2014-7817 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. The wordexp function in GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.21 does not enforce the WRDE_NOCMD flag, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary commands, as demonstrated by input containing "$((`...`))".. EPSS estimates a 0.58% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
The wordexp function in GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.21 does not enforce the WRDE_NOCMD flag, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary commands, as demonstrated by input containing "$((`...`))".
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Canonical | Ubuntu Linux | 10.04 |
| Canonical | Ubuntu Linux | 12.04 |
| Canonical | Ubuntu Linux | 14.04 |
| Canonical | Ubuntu Linux | 14.10 |
| Debian | Debian Linux | 7.0 |
| Gnu | Glibc | 2.21 |
| Opensuse | Opensuse | 13.1 |
| Opensuse | Opensuse | 13.2 |
References
- http://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2015-0092.htmlVendor Advisory
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-2023.htmlVendor Advisory
- http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3142Vendor Advisory
- https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-11/msg00519.htmlVendor Advisory
- http://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2015-0092.htmlVendor Advisory
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-2023.htmlVendor Advisory
- http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3142Vendor Advisory
- https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-11/msg00519.htmlVendor Advisory
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2014-7817?
The wordexp function in GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.21 does not enforce the WRDE_NOCMD flag, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary commands, as demonstrated by input containing "$((`...`))".
How severe is CVE-2014-7817?
Severity scoring for CVE-2014-7817 is pending analysis. The EPSS model estimates a 0.58% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
How do I fix CVE-2014-7817?
Check the vendor references and advisories linked above for patched versions and mitigation guidance. You can also run a Strix scan to test if your systems are affected.
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2014
- CVE-2014-7811Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Space…
- CVE-2014-7812Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Spacewalk and Re…
- CVE-2014-7813Red Hat CloudForms 3 Management Engine (CFME) allows remote …
- CVE-2014-7814SQL injection vulnerability in Red Hat CloudForms 3.1 Manage…
- CVE-2014-7815The set_pixel_format function in ui/vnc.c in QEMU allows rem…
- CVE-2014-7816Directory traversal vulnerability in JBoss Undertow 1.0.x be…
- CVE-2014-7818Directory traversal vulnerability in actionpack/lib/action_d…
- CVE-2014-7819Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in server.rb in…
- CVE-2014-7820Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2014-7821OpenStack Neutron before 2014.1.4 and 2014.2.x before 2014.2…
- CVE-2014-7822The implementation of certain splice_write file operations i…
- CVE-2014-7823The virDomainGetXMLDesc API in Libvirt before 1.2.11 allows …
Are you affected by CVE-2014-7817?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
