CVE-2016-0772
Last modified
CVE-2016-0772 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. The smtplib library in CPython (aka Python) before 2.7.12, 3.x before 3.4.5, and 3.5.x before 3.5.2 does not return an error when StartTLS fails, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass the TLS protections by leveraging a network position between the client and the registry to block the StartTLS command, aka a "StartTLS stripping attack.". EPSS estimates a 14.52% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
The smtplib library in CPython (aka Python) before 2.7.12, 3.x before 3.4.5, and 3.5.x before 3.5.2 does not return an error when StartTLS fails, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass the TLS protections by leveraging a network position between the client and the registry to block the StartTLS command, aka a "StartTLS stripping attack."
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Python | Python | 3.5.0 |
| Python | Python | 3.5.1 |
| Python | Python | 3.0 |
| Python | Python | 3.0.1 |
| Python | Python | 3.1.0 |
| Python | Python | 3.1.1 |
| Python | Python | 3.1.2 |
| Python | Python | 3.1.3 |
| Python | Python | 3.1.4 |
| Python | Python | 3.1.5 |
| Python | Python | 3.2.0 |
| Python | Python | 3.2.1 |
| Python | Python | 3.2.2 |
| Python | Python | 3.2.3 |
| Python | Python | 3.2.4 |
| Python | Python | 3.2.5 |
| Python | Python | 3.2.6 |
| Python | Python | 3.3.0 |
| Python | Python | 3.3.1 |
| Python | Python | 3.3.2 |
| Python | Python | 3.3.3 |
| Python | Python | 3.3.4 |
| Python | Python | 3.3.5 |
| Python | Python | 3.3.6 |
| Python | Python | 3.4.0 |
| Python | Python | 3.4.1 |
| Python | Python | 3.4.2 |
| Python | Python | 3.4.3 |
| Python | Python | 3.4.4 |
| Python | Python | <= 2.7.11 |
References
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303647Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303647Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2016-0772?
How severe is CVE-2016-0772?
How do I fix CVE-2016-0772?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2016
- CVE-2016-0766PostgreSQL before 9.1.20, 9.2.x before 9.2.15, 9.3.x before …8.8
- CVE-2016-0767PostgreSQL PL/Java before 1.5.0 allows remote authenticated …6.5
- CVE-2016-0768PostgreSQL PL/Java after 9.0 does not honor access controls …
- CVE-2016-0769Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in eshop-orders.php i…
- CVE-2016-0770Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in includes/admin/p…
- CVE-2016-0771The internal DNS server in Samba 4.x before 4.1.23, 4.2.x be…
- CVE-2016-0773PostgreSQL before 9.1.20, 9.2.x before 9.2.15, 9.3.x before …
- CVE-2016-0774The (1) pipe_read and (2) pipe_write implementations in fs/p…
- CVE-2016-0775Buffer overflow in the ImagingFliDecode function in libImagi…
- CVE-2016-0776Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultI…
- CVE-2016-0777The resend_bytes function in roaming_common.c in the client …6.5
- CVE-2016-0778The (1) roaming_read and (2) roaming_write functions in roam…8.1
Are you affected by CVE-2016-0772?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
