CVE-2016-10728
UnknownEPSS 2.09%
Last modified
CVE-2016-10728 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. An issue was discovered in Suricata before 3.1.2. If an ICMPv4 error packet is received as the first packet on a flow in the to_client direction, it confuses the rule grouping lookup logic. EPSS estimates a 2.09% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
An issue was discovered in Suricata before 3.1.2. If an ICMPv4 error packet is received as the first packet on a flow in the to_client direction, it confuses the rule grouping lookup logic. The toclient inspection will then continue with the wrong rule group. This can lead to missed detection.
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Suricata-Ids | Suricata | < 3.1.2 |
References
- https://github.com/kirillwow/ids_bypassExploit, Third Party Advisory
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00019.htmlThird Party Advisory
- https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/1880Third Party Advisory
- https://suricata-ids.org/2016/09/07/suricata-3-1-2-released/Vendor Advisory
- https://github.com/kirillwow/ids_bypassExploit, Third Party Advisory
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00019.htmlThird Party Advisory
- https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/1880Third Party Advisory
- https://suricata-ids.org/2016/09/07/suricata-3-1-2-released/Vendor Advisory
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2016-10728?
An issue was discovered in Suricata before 3.1.2. If an ICMPv4 error packet is received as the first packet on a flow in the to_client direction, it confuses the rule grouping lookup logic. The toclient inspection will then continue with the wrong rule group. This can lead to missed detection.
How severe is CVE-2016-10728?
Severity scoring for CVE-2016-10728 is pending analysis. The EPSS model estimates a 2.09% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
How do I fix CVE-2016-10728?
Check the vendor references and advisories linked above for patched versions and mitigation guidance. You can also run a Strix scan to test if your systems are affected.
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2016
- CVE-2016-10722partclone.fat in Partclone before 0.2.88 is prone to a heap-…9.8
- CVE-2016-10723An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel through 4.17.2. …
- CVE-2016-10724Bitcoin Core before v0.13.0 allows denial of service (memory…
- CVE-2016-10725In Bitcoin Core before v0.13.0, a non-final alert is able to…
- CVE-2016-10726The XMLUI feature in DSpace before 3.6, 4.x before 4.5, and …
- CVE-2016-10727camel/providers/imapx/camel-imapx-server.c in the IMAPx comp…
- CVE-2016-10729An issue was discovered in Amanda 3.3.1. A user with backup …
- CVE-2016-1073Adobe Reader and Acrobat before 11.0.16, Acrobat and Acrobat…
- CVE-2016-10730An issue was discovered in Amanda 3.3.1. A user with backup …
- CVE-2016-10731ProjectSend (formerly cFTP) r582 allows SQL injection via ma…
- CVE-2016-10732ProjectSend (formerly cFTP) r582 allows authentication bypas…
- CVE-2016-10733ProjectSend (formerly cFTP) r582 allows directory traversal …
Are you affected by CVE-2016-10728?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
