CVE-2016-7028
Unknown
Last modified
This CVE is reserved or rejected; no details have been published by NVD.
Description
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0728. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-0728. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0728 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Rejected
Related CVEs from 2016
- CVE-2016-7022Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-7023Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-7024Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-7025Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-7026Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-7027Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-7029Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-7030FreeIPA uses a default password policy that locks an account…
- CVE-2016-7031The RGW code in Ceph before 10.0.1, when authenticated-read …
- CVE-2016-7032sudo_noexec.so in Sudo before 1.8.15 on Linux might allow lo…
- CVE-2016-7033Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the a…
- CVE-2016-7034The dashbuilder in Red Hat JBoss BPM Suite 6.3.2 does not pr…
Are you affected by CVE-2016-7028?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST