CVE-2016-9527
Unknown
Last modified
This CVE is reserved or rejected; no details have been published by NVD.
Description
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Rejected
Related CVEs from 2016
- CVE-2016-9521Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-9522Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-9523Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-9524Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-9525Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-9526Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-9528Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-9529Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-9530Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-9531Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-9532Integer overflow in the writeBufferToSeparateStrips function…
- CVE-2016-9533tif_pixarlog.c in libtiff 4.0.6 has out-of-bounds write vuln…
Are you affected by CVE-2016-9527?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
