CVE-2016-9621
Unknown
Last modified
This CVE is reserved or rejected; no details have been published by NVD.
Description
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9429. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9429. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9429 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Rejected
Related CVEs from 2016
- CVE-2016-9615Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-9616Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-9617Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-9618Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-9619Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-9620Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
- CVE-2016-9622An issue was discovered in the Tatsuya Kinoshita w3m fork be…
- CVE-2016-9623An issue was discovered in the Tatsuya Kinoshita w3m fork be…
- CVE-2016-9624An issue was discovered in the Tatsuya Kinoshita w3m fork be…
- CVE-2016-9625An issue was discovered in the Tatsuya Kinoshita w3m fork be…
- CVE-2016-9626An issue was discovered in the Tatsuya Kinoshita w3m fork be…
- CVE-2016-9627An issue was discovered in the Tatsuya Kinoshita w3m fork be…
Are you affected by CVE-2016-9621?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST