CVE-2016-9964
UnknownEPSS 1.76%
Last modified
CVE-2016-9964 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. redirect() in bottle.py in bottle 0.12.10 doesn't filter a "\r\n" sequence, which leads to a CRLF attack, as demonstrated by a redirect("233\r\nSet-Cookie: name=salt") call.. EPSS estimates a 1.76% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
redirect() in bottle.py in bottle 0.12.10 doesn't filter a "\r\n" sequence, which leads to a CRLF attack, as demonstrated by a redirect("233\r\nSet-Cookie: name=salt") call.
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Bottlepy | Bottle | 0.12.10 |
| Debian | Debian Linux | 8.0 |
References
- http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3743Third Party Advisory
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94961Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry
- https://github.com/bottlepy/bottle/commit/6d7e13da0f998820800ecb3fe9ccee4189aefb54Issue Tracking, Patch, Third Party Advisory
- https://github.com/bottlepy/bottle/issues/913Issue Tracking, Patch, Third Party Advisory
- http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3743Third Party Advisory
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94961Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry
- https://github.com/bottlepy/bottle/commit/6d7e13da0f998820800ecb3fe9ccee4189aefb54Issue Tracking, Patch, Third Party Advisory
- https://github.com/bottlepy/bottle/issues/913Issue Tracking, Patch, Third Party Advisory
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2016-9964?
redirect() in bottle.py in bottle 0.12.10 doesn't filter a "\r\n" sequence, which leads to a CRLF attack, as demonstrated by a redirect("233\r\nSet-Cookie: name=salt") call.
How severe is CVE-2016-9964?
Severity scoring for CVE-2016-9964 is pending analysis. The EPSS model estimates a 1.76% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
How do I fix CVE-2016-9964?
Check the vendor references and advisories linked above for patched versions and mitigation guidance. You can also run a Strix scan to test if your systems are affected.
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2016
- CVE-2016-9958game-music-emu before 0.6.1 allows remote attackers to write…
- CVE-2016-9959game-music-emu before 0.6.1 allows remote attackers to gener…
- CVE-2016-9960game-music-emu before 0.6.1 allows local users to cause a de…
- CVE-2016-9961game-music-emu before 0.6.1 mishandles unspecified integer v…
- CVE-2016-9962RunC allowed additional container processes via 'runc exec' …
- CVE-2016-9963Exim before 4.87.1 might allow remote attackers to obtain th…
- CVE-2016-9965Lack of appropriate exception handling in some receivers of …
- CVE-2016-9966Lack of appropriate exception handling in some receivers of …
- CVE-2016-9967Lack of appropriate exception handling in some receivers of …
- CVE-2016-9969In libwebp 0.5.1, there is a double free bug in libwebpmux.
- CVE-2016-9972IBM QRadar 7.2 and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to obta…
- CVE-2016-9973IBM Jazz Foundation is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. T…
Are you affected by CVE-2016-9964?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
