CVE-2017-3735
UnknownEPSS 17.70%
Last modified
CVE-2017-3735 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. While parsing an IPAddressFamily extension in an X.509 certificate, it is possible to do a one-byte overread. This would result in an incorrect text display of the certificate. EPSS estimates a 17.70% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
While parsing an IPAddressFamily extension in an X.509 certificate, it is possible to do a one-byte overread. This would result in an incorrect text display of the certificate. This bug has been present since 2006 and is present in all versions of OpenSSL before 1.0.2m and 1.1.0g.
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.7j |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.7k |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.7l |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.7m |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8 |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8a |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8b |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8c |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8d |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8e |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8f |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8g |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8h |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8i |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8j |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8k |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8l |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8m |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8n |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8o |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8p |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8q |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8r |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8s |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8t |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8u |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8v |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8w |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8x |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8y |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8z |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8za |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8zb |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8zc |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8ze |
| Openssl | Openssl | 0.9.8zg |
| Openssl | Openssl | 1.0.0 |
| Openssl | Openssl | 1.0.0a |
| Openssl | Openssl | 1.0.0b |
| Openssl | Openssl | 1.0.0c |
| Openssl | Openssl | 1.0.0d |
| Openssl | Openssl | 1.0.0e |
| Openssl | Openssl | 1.0.0f |
| Openssl | Openssl | 1.0.0g |
| Openssl | Openssl | 1.0.0h |
| Openssl | Openssl | 1.0.0i |
| Openssl | Openssl | 1.0.0j |
| Openssl | Openssl | 1.0.0k |
| Openssl | Openssl | 1.0.0l |
| Openssl | Openssl | 1.0.0m |
Showing 50 of 90 affected configurations. See NVD for the full list.
References
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100515Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039726Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20170927-0001/Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20171107-0002/Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory
- https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4017Third Party Advisory
- https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4018Third Party Advisory
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20170828.txtPatch, Vendor Advisory
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20171102.txtIssue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-14Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100515Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039726Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20170927-0001/Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20171107-0002/Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory
- https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4017Third Party Advisory
- https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4018Third Party Advisory
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20170828.txtPatch, Vendor Advisory
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20171102.txtIssue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-14Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2017-3735?
While parsing an IPAddressFamily extension in an X.509 certificate, it is possible to do a one-byte overread. This would result in an incorrect text display of the certificate. This bug has been present since 2006 and is present in all versions of OpenSSL before 1.0.2m and 1.1.0g.
How severe is CVE-2017-3735?
Severity scoring for CVE-2017-3735 is pending analysis. The EPSS model estimates a 17.70% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
How do I fix CVE-2017-3735?
Check the vendor references and advisories linked above for patched versions and mitigation guidance. You can also run a Strix scan to test if your systems are affected.
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2017
- CVE-2017-3718Improper setting of device configuration in system firmware …
- CVE-2017-3730In OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d, if a malicious server suppli…
- CVE-2017-3731If an SSL/TLS server or client is running on a 32-bit host, …7.5
- CVE-2017-3732There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery sq…5.9
- CVE-2017-3733During a renegotiation handshake if the Encrypt-Then-Mac ext…
- CVE-2017-3734Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultI…
- CVE-2017-3736There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery sq…
- CVE-2017-3737OpenSSL 1.0.2 (starting from version 1.0.2b) introduced an "…
- CVE-2017-3738There is an overflow bug in the AVX2 Montgomery multiplicati…5.9
- CVE-2017-3739Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultI…
- CVE-2017-3740In Lenovo Active Protection System before 1.82.0.14, an atta…
- CVE-2017-3741In the Lenovo Power Management driver before 1.67.12.24, a l…
Are you affected by CVE-2017-3735?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST