CVE-2019-12321

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-12317. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-12317. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-12317 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

Published

May 28, 2019

Last Modified

Nov 7, 2023

Status

Rejected

• CVE-2019-12311Sandline Centraleyezer (On Premises) allows Unrestricted Fil…6.1
• CVE-2019-12312In Libreswan 3.27 an assertion failure can lead to a pluto I…
• CVE-2019-12313XSS exists in Shave before 2.5.3 because output encoding is …
• CVE-2019-12314Deltek Maconomy 2.2.5 is prone to local file inclusion via a…
• CVE-2019-12315Samsung SCX-824 printers allow a reflected Cross-Site-Script…
• CVE-2019-1232An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Diag…7.8
• CVE-2019-12323The HC.Server service in Hosting Controller HC10 10.14 allow…
• CVE-2019-12324A command injection (missing input validation) issue in the …7.2
• CVE-2019-12325The Htek UC902 VoIP phone web management interface contains …8.8
• CVE-2019-12326Missing file and path validation in the ringtone upload func…7.2
• CVE-2019-12327Hardcoded credentials in the Akuvox R50P VoIP phone 50.0.6.1…7.2
• CVE-2019-12328A command injection (missing input validation) issue in the …9