CVE-2021-34250

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-33396. Reason: This record is a duplicate of CVE-2021-33396. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-33396 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage.

Published

Apr 11, 2022

Last Modified

Nov 7, 2023

Status

Rejected

• CVE-2021-3424A flaw was found in keycloak as shipped in Red Hat Single Si…5.3
• CVE-2021-34243A stored cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability was discov…5.4
• CVE-2021-34244A cross site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was discov…8.8
• CVE-2021-34248Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultID…
• CVE-2021-34249SQL injection vulnerability in sourcecodester online-book-st…7.5
• CVE-2021-3425A flaw was found in the AMQ Broker that discloses JDBC encry…4.4
• CVE-2021-34254Umbraco CMS before 7.15.7 is vulnerable to Open Redirection …6.1
• CVE-2021-34257Multiple Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerabilities exist i…8.8
• CVE-2021-34259A buffer overflow vulnerability in the USBH_ParseCfgDesc() f…6.8
• CVE-2021-3426There's a flaw in Python 3's pydoc. A local or adjacent atta…5.7
• CVE-2021-34260A buffer overflow vulnerability in the USBH_ParseInterfaceDe…6.8
• CVE-2021-34261An issue in USBH_ParseCfgDesc() of STMicroelectronics STM32C…4.6