CVE-2023-52909
Last modified
CVE-2023-52909 is a medium-severity vulnerability rated 4.7/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix handling of cached open files in nfsd4_open codepath Commit fb70bf124b05 ("NFSD: Instantiate a struct file when creating a regular NFSv4 file") added the ability to cache an open fd over a compound. There are a couple of problems with the way this currently works: It's racy, as a newly-created nfsd_file can end up with its PENDING bit cleared while the nf is hashed, and the nf_file pointer is still zeroed out. EPSS estimates a 0.24% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix handling of cached open files in nfsd4_open codepath Commit fb70bf124b05 ("NFSD: Instantiate a struct file when creating a regular NFSv4 file") added the ability to cache an open fd over a compound. There are a couple of problems with the way this currently works: It's racy, as a newly-created nfsd_file can end up with its PENDING bit cleared while the nf is hashed, and the nf_file pointer is still zeroed out. Other tasks can find it in this state and they expect to see a valid nf_file, and can oops if nf_file is NULL. Also, there is no guarantee that we'll end up creating a new nfsd_file if one is already in the hash. If an extant entry is in the hash with a valid nf_file, nfs4_get_vfs_file will clobber its nf_file pointer with the value of op_file and the old nf_file will leak. Fix both issues by making a new nfsd_file_acquirei_opened variant that takes an optional file pointer. If one is present when this is called, we'll take a new reference to it instead of trying to open the file. If the nfsd_file already has a valid nf_file, we'll just ignore the optional file and pass the nfsd_file back as-is. Also rework the tracepoints a bit to allow for an "opened" variant and don't try to avoid counting acquisitions in the case where we already have a cached open file.
Metrics
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Update |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 5.19, < 6.1.7 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 6.2 | Rc1 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2023-52909?
How severe is CVE-2023-52909?
How do I fix CVE-2023-52909?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2023
- CVE-2023-52903In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2023-52904In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2023-52905In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2023-52906In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2023-52907In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2023-52908In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2023-5291The Blog Filter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored…5.4
- CVE-2023-52910In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2023-52911In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2023-52912In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2023-52913In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2023-52914In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
Are you affected by CVE-2023-52909?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
