CVE-2024-38598
Last modified
CVE-2024-38598 is a medium-severity vulnerability rated 5.5/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: fix resync softlockup when bitmap size is less than array size Is is reported that for dm-raid10, lvextend + lvchange --syncaction will trigger following softlockup: kernel:watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 26s! [mdX_resync:6976] CPU: 7 PID: 3588 Comm: mdX_resync Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-next-20240419 #1 RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x13/0x30 Call Trace: <TASK> md_bitmap_start_sync+0x6b/0xf0 raid10_sync_request+0x25c/0x1b40 [raid10] md_do_sync+0x64b/0x1020 md_thread+0xa7/0x170 kthread+0xcf/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 And the detailed process is as follows: md_do_sync j = mddev->resync_min while (j < max_sectors) sectors = raid10_sync_request(mddev, j, &skipped) if (!md_bitmap_start_sync(..., &sync_blocks)) // md_bitmap_start_sync set sync_blocks to 0 return sync_blocks + sectors_skippe; // sectors = 0; j += sectors; // j never change Root cause is that commit 301867b1c168 ("md/raid10: check slab-out-of-bounds in md_bitmap_get_counter") return early from md_bitmap_get_counter(), without setting returned blocks. Fix this problem by always set returned blocks from md_bitmap_get_counter"(), as it used to be. Noted that this patch just fix the softlockup problem in kernel, the case that bitmap size doesn't match array size still need to be fixed.. EPSS estimates a 0.20% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: fix resync softlockup when bitmap size is less than array size Is is reported that for dm-raid10, lvextend + lvchange --syncaction will trigger following softlockup: kernel:watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 26s! [mdX_resync:6976] CPU: 7 PID: 3588 Comm: mdX_resync Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-next-20240419 #1 RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x13/0x30 Call Trace: <TASK> md_bitmap_start_sync+0x6b/0xf0 raid10_sync_request+0x25c/0x1b40 [raid10] md_do_sync+0x64b/0x1020 md_thread+0xa7/0x170 kthread+0xcf/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 And the detailed process is as follows: md_do_sync j = mddev->resync_min while (j < max_sectors) sectors = raid10_sync_request(mddev, j, &skipped) if (!md_bitmap_start_sync(..., &sync_blocks)) // md_bitmap_start_sync set sync_blocks to 0 return sync_blocks + sectors_skippe; // sectors = 0; j += sectors; // j never change Root cause is that commit 301867b1c168 ("md/raid10: check slab-out-of-bounds in md_bitmap_get_counter") return early from md_bitmap_get_counter(), without setting returned blocks. Fix this problem by always set returned blocks from md_bitmap_get_counter"(), as it used to be. Noted that this patch just fix the softlockup problem in kernel, the case that bitmap size doesn't match array size still need to be fixed.
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 4.19.291, < 4.19.316 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 5.4.251, < 5.4.278 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 5.10.188, < 5.10.219 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 5.15.121, < 5.15.161 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.1.39, < 6.1.93 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.5, < 6.6.33 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.7, < 6.8.12 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.9, < 6.9.3 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2024-38598?
How severe is CVE-2024-38598?
How do I fix CVE-2024-38598?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2024
- CVE-2024-38592In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-38593In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-38594In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-38595In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-38596In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…4.7
- CVE-2024-38597In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-38599In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.1
- CVE-2024-3860An out-of-memory condition during object initialization coul…6.2
- CVE-2024-38600In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-38601In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…4.7
- CVE-2024-38602In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-38603In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
Are you affected by CVE-2024-38598?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
