CVE-2024-40950
Last modified
CVE-2024-40950 is a medium-severity vulnerability rated 5.5/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: huge_memory: fix misused mapping_large_folio_support() for anon folios When I did a large folios split test, a WARNING "[ 5059.122759][ T166] Cannot split file folio to non-0 order" was triggered. But the test cases are only for anonmous folios. EPSS estimates a 0.21% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: huge_memory: fix misused mapping_large_folio_support() for anon folios When I did a large folios split test, a WARNING "[ 5059.122759][ T166] Cannot split file folio to non-0 order" was triggered. But the test cases are only for anonmous folios. while mapping_large_folio_support() is only reasonable for page cache folios. In split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(), the folio passed to mapping_large_folio_support() maybe anonmous folio. The folio_test_anon() check is missing. So the split of the anonmous THP is failed. This is also the same for shmem_mapping(). We'd better add a check for both. But the shmem_mapping() in __split_huge_page() is not involved, as for anonmous folios, the end parameter is set to -1, so (head[i].index >= end) is always false. shmem_mapping() is not called. Also add a VM_WARN_ON_ONCE() in mapping_large_folio_support() for anon mapping, So we can detect the wrong use more easily. THP folios maybe exist in the pagecache even the file system doesn't support large folio, it is because when CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is enabled, khugepaged will try to collapse read-only file-backed pages to THP. But the mapping does not actually support multi order large folios properly. Using /sys/kernel/debug/split_huge_pages to verify this, with this patch, large anon THP is successfully split and the warning is ceased.
Metrics
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Update |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.9, < 6.9.7 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 6.10 | Rc1 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Analyzed
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2024-40950?
How severe is CVE-2024-40950?
How do I fix CVE-2024-40950?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2024
- CVE-2024-40945In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-40946Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn …
- CVE-2024-40947In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-40948In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-40949In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-4095The Collapse-O-Matic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to S…6.4
- CVE-2024-40951In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-40952In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-40953In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…4.7
- CVE-2024-40954In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2024-40955In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-40956In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
Are you affected by CVE-2024-40950?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
