CVE-2024-57924
Last modified
CVE-2024-57924 is a medium-severity vulnerability rated 5.5/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem >encode_fh() method that may fail for various reasons. The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility of failure to encode a file handle. There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when ->encode_fh() fails. Relax those assertions because they are wrong. The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 ("ovl: support encoding non-decodable file handles") in v6.6 as the regressing commit, but this is not accurate. The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs, inotify and drop_caches. Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and other reasons of ->encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlayfs that is mounted with options index=on,nfs_export=on also on kernels < v6.6. Therefore, I am not listing the aforementioned commit as a Fixes commit. Backport hint: this patch will have a trivial conflict applying to v6.6.y, and other trivial conflicts applying to stable kernels < v6.6.. EPSS estimates a 0.20% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem >encode_fh() method that may fail for various reasons. The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility of failure to encode a file handle. There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when ->encode_fh() fails. Relax those assertions because they are wrong. The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 ("ovl: support encoding non-decodable file handles") in v6.6 as the regressing commit, but this is not accurate. The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs, inotify and drop_caches. Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and other reasons of ->encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlayfs that is mounted with options index=on,nfs_export=on also on kernels < v6.6. Therefore, I am not listing the aforementioned commit as a Fixes commit. Backport hint: this patch will have a trivial conflict applying to v6.6.y, and other trivial conflicts applying to stable kernels < v6.6.
Metrics
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Update |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux Kernel | < 6.1.151 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.2, < 6.6.74 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.7, < 6.12.10 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 6.13 | Rc1 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2024-57924?
How severe is CVE-2024-57924?
How do I fix CVE-2024-57924?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2024
- CVE-2024-57919In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-5792The Houzez CRM plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-ba…8.8
- CVE-2024-57920Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn …
- CVE-2024-57921In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-57922In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-57923In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-57925In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.1
- CVE-2024-57926In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2024-57927In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2024-57928In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.1
- CVE-2024-57929In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.1
- CVE-2024-5793The Houzez Theme - Functionality plugin for WordPress is vul…8.8
Are you affected by CVE-2024-57924?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
