CVE-2025-21702
Last modified
CVE-2025-21702 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 7/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: pfifo_tail_enqueue: Drop new packet when sch->limit == 0 Expected behaviour: In case we reach scheduler's limit, pfifo_tail_enqueue() will drop a packet in scheduler's queue and decrease scheduler's qlen by one. Then, pfifo_tail_enqueue() enqueue new packet and increase scheduler's qlen by one. Finally, pfifo_tail_enqueue() return `NET_XMIT_CN` status code. Weird behaviour: In case we set `sch->limit == 0` and trigger pfifo_tail_enqueue() on a scheduler that has no packet, the 'drop a packet' step will do nothing. This means the scheduler's qlen still has value equal 0. Then, we continue to enqueue new packet and increase scheduler's qlen by one. EPSS estimates a 0.26% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: pfifo_tail_enqueue: Drop new packet when sch->limit == 0 Expected behaviour: In case we reach scheduler's limit, pfifo_tail_enqueue() will drop a packet in scheduler's queue and decrease scheduler's qlen by one. Then, pfifo_tail_enqueue() enqueue new packet and increase scheduler's qlen by one. Finally, pfifo_tail_enqueue() return `NET_XMIT_CN` status code. Weird behaviour: In case we set `sch->limit == 0` and trigger pfifo_tail_enqueue() on a scheduler that has no packet, the 'drop a packet' step will do nothing. This means the scheduler's qlen still has value equal 0. Then, we continue to enqueue new packet and increase scheduler's qlen by one. In summary, we can leverage pfifo_tail_enqueue() to increase qlen by one and return `NET_XMIT_CN` status code. The problem is: Let's say we have two qdiscs: Qdisc_A and Qdisc_B. - Qdisc_A's type must have '->graft()' function to create parent/child relationship. Let's say Qdisc_A's type is `hfsc`. Enqueue packet to this qdisc will trigger `hfsc_enqueue`. - Qdisc_B's type is pfifo_head_drop. Enqueue packet to this qdisc will trigger `pfifo_tail_enqueue`. - Qdisc_B is configured to have `sch->limit == 0`. - Qdisc_A is configured to route the enqueued's packet to Qdisc_B. Enqueue packet through Qdisc_A will lead to: - hfsc_enqueue(Qdisc_A) -> pfifo_tail_enqueue(Qdisc_B) - Qdisc_B->q.qlen += 1 - pfifo_tail_enqueue() return `NET_XMIT_CN` - hfsc_enqueue() check for `NET_XMIT_SUCCESS` and see `NET_XMIT_CN` => hfsc_enqueue() don't increase qlen of Qdisc_A. The whole process lead to a situation where Qdisc_A->q.qlen == 0 and Qdisc_B->q.qlen == 1. Replace 'hfsc' with other type (for example: 'drr') still lead to the same problem. This violate the design where parent's qlen should equal to the sum of its childrens'qlen. Bug impact: This issue can be used for user->kernel privilege escalation when it is reachable.
Metrics
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Update |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 2.6.34, < 5.4.291 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 5.5, < 5.10.235 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 5.11, < 5.15.179 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 5.16, < 6.1.130 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.2, < 6.6.83 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.7, < 6.12.14 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.13, < 6.13.3 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 6.14 | Rc1 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2025-21702?
How severe is CVE-2025-21702?
How do I fix CVE-2025-21702?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2025
- CVE-2025-21697In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2025-21698Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn …
- CVE-2025-21699In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2025-2170A Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been …7.2
- CVE-2025-21700In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2025-21701In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…4.7
- CVE-2025-21703In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2025-21704In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2025-21705In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2025-21706In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2025-21707In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2025-21708In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
Are you affected by CVE-2025-21702?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
