CVE-2025-38724
Last modified
CVE-2025-38724 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 7.8/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: handle get_client_locked() failure in nfsd4_setclientid_confirm() Lei Lu recently reported that nfsd4_setclientid_confirm() did not check the return value from get_client_locked(). a SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM could race with a confirmed client expiring and fail to get a reference. EPSS estimates a 0.16% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: handle get_client_locked() failure in nfsd4_setclientid_confirm() Lei Lu recently reported that nfsd4_setclientid_confirm() did not check the return value from get_client_locked(). a SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM could race with a confirmed client expiring and fail to get a reference. That could later lead to a UAF. Fix this by getting a reference early in the case where there is an extant confirmed client. If that fails then treat it as if there were no confirmed client found at all. In the case where the unconfirmed client is expiring, just fail and return the result from get_client_locked().
Metrics
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 3.17, < 5.4.297 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 5.5, < 5.10.241 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 5.11, < 5.15.190 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 5.16, < 6.1.149 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.2, < 6.6.103 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.7, < 6.12.43 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.13, < 6.15.11 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.16, < 6.16.2 |
| Debian | Debian Linux | 11.0 |
References
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00007.htmlMailing List, Third Party Advisory
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00008.htmlMailing List, Third Party Advisory
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2025-38724?
How severe is CVE-2025-38724?
How do I fix CVE-2025-38724?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2025
- CVE-2025-38719In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2025-3872Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL C…7.2
- CVE-2025-38720In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2025-38721In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2025-38722In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2025-38723In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2025-38725In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2025-38726In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2025-38727In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2025-38728In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.1
- CVE-2025-38729In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2025-3873The following APIs for the Silcon Labs SiWx91x prior to vesi…6
Are you affected by CVE-2025-38724?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
