CVE-2025-68298
Last modified
CVE-2025-68298 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: btusb: mediatek: Avoid btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf() NULL deref In btusb_mtk_setup(), we set `btmtk_data->isopkt_intf` to: usb_ifnum_to_if(data->udev, MTK_ISO_IFNUM) That function can return NULL in some cases. Even when it returns NULL, though, we still go on to call btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf(). As of commit e9087e828827 ("Bluetooth: btusb: mediatek: Add locks for usb_driver_claim_interface()"), calling btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf() when `btmtk_data->isopkt_intf` is NULL will cause a crash because we'll end up passing a bad pointer to device_lock(). EPSS estimates a 0.15% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: btusb: mediatek: Avoid btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf() NULL deref In btusb_mtk_setup(), we set `btmtk_data->isopkt_intf` to: usb_ifnum_to_if(data->udev, MTK_ISO_IFNUM) That function can return NULL in some cases. Even when it returns NULL, though, we still go on to call btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf(). As of commit e9087e828827 ("Bluetooth: btusb: mediatek: Add locks for usb_driver_claim_interface()"), calling btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf() when `btmtk_data->isopkt_intf` is NULL will cause a crash because we'll end up passing a bad pointer to device_lock(). Prior to that commit we'd pass the NULL pointer directly to usb_driver_claim_interface() which would detect it and return an error, which was handled. Resolve the crash in btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf() by adding a NULL check at the start of the function. This makes the code handle a NULL `btmtk_data->isopkt_intf` the same way it did before the problematic commit (just with a slight change to the error message printed).
Metrics
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= 930e1790b99e5839e1af69d2f7fd808f1fba2df9, < 2fa09fe98ca3b114d66285f65f7e108fea131815; >= e9087e828827e5a5c85e124ce77503f2b81c3491, < c3b990e0b23068da65f0004cd38ee31f43f36460; >= e9087e828827e5a5c85e124ce77503f2b81c3491, < c884a0b27b4586e607431d86a1aa0bb4fb39169c; 4194766ec8756f4f654d595ae49962acbac49490; >= 6.12.13, < 6.12.61; >= 6.13.2, < 6.14 |
| Linux | Linux | 6.14 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Deferred
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2025-68298?
How severe is CVE-2025-68298?
How do I fix CVE-2025-68298?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2025
- CVE-2025-68292In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-68293In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-68294In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2025-68295In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-68296In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-68297In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-68299In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-6830Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL C…9.8
- CVE-2025-68300In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-68301In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…9.8
- CVE-2025-68302In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.5
- CVE-2025-68303In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
Are you affected by CVE-2025-68298?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
