CVE-2025-68740
Last modified
CVE-2025-68740 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ima: Handle error code returned by ima_filter_rule_match() In ima_match_rules(), if ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ENOENT due to the rule being NULL, the function incorrectly skips the 'if (!rc)' check and sets 'result = true'. The LSM rule is considered a match, causing extra files to be measured by IMA. This issue can be reproduced in the following scenario: After unloading the SELinux policy module via 'semodule -d', if an IMA measurement is triggered before ima_lsm_rules is updated, in ima_match_rules(), the first call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ESTALE. EPSS estimates a 0.19% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ima: Handle error code returned by ima_filter_rule_match() In ima_match_rules(), if ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ENOENT due to the rule being NULL, the function incorrectly skips the 'if (!rc)' check and sets 'result = true'. The LSM rule is considered a match, causing extra files to be measured by IMA. This issue can be reproduced in the following scenario: After unloading the SELinux policy module via 'semodule -d', if an IMA measurement is triggered before ima_lsm_rules is updated, in ima_match_rules(), the first call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ESTALE. This causes the code to enter the 'if (rc == -ESTALE && !rule_reinitialized)' block, perform ima_lsm_copy_rule() and retry. In ima_lsm_copy_rule(), since the SELinux module has been removed, the rule becomes NULL, and the second call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ENOENT. This bypasses the 'if (!rc)' check and results in a false match. Call trace: selinux_audit_rule_match+0x310/0x3b8 security_audit_rule_match+0x60/0xa0 ima_match_rules+0x2e4/0x4a0 ima_match_policy+0x9c/0x1e8 ima_get_action+0x48/0x60 process_measurement+0xf8/0xa98 ima_bprm_check+0x98/0xd8 security_bprm_check+0x5c/0x78 search_binary_handler+0x6c/0x318 exec_binprm+0x58/0x1b8 bprm_execve+0xb8/0x130 do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x1a8/0x258 __arm64_sys_execve+0x48/0x68 invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xf0 do_el0_svc+0x24/0x38 el0_svc+0x44/0x200 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x130 el0t_64_sync+0x3c8/0x3d0 Fix this by changing 'if (!rc)' to 'if (rc <= 0)' to ensure that error codes like -ENOENT do not bypass the check and accidentally result in a successful match.
Metrics
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= 4af4662fa4a9dc62289c580337ae2506339c4729, < d14e0ec6a6828ee0dffa163fb5d513c9a21f0a51; >= 4af4662fa4a9dc62289c580337ae2506339c4729, < f2f4627b74c120fcdd8e1db93bc91f9bbaf46f85; >= 4af4662fa4a9dc62289c580337ae2506339c4729, < 88cd5fbf5869731be8fc6f7cecb4e0d6ab3d8749; >= 4af4662fa4a9dc62289c580337ae2506339c4729, < cca3e7df3c0f99542033657ba850b9a6d27f8784; >= 4af4662fa4a9dc62289c580337ae2506339c4729, < c2238d487a640ae3511e1b6f4640ab27ce10d7f6; >= 4af4662fa4a9dc62289c580337ae2506339c4729, < de4431faf308d0c533cb386f5fa9af009bc86158; >= 4af4662fa4a9dc62289c580337ae2506339c4729, < 32952c4f4d1b2deb30dce72ba109da808a9018e1; >= 4af4662fa4a9dc62289c580337ae2506339c4729, < 738c9738e690f5cea24a3ad6fd2d9a323cf614f6 |
| Linux | Linux | 2.6.30 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Deferred
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2025-68740?
How severe is CVE-2025-68740?
How do I fix CVE-2025-68740?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2025
- CVE-2025-68735In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2025-68736In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.8
- CVE-2025-68737In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-68738In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-68739In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-6874A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found…8.8
- CVE-2025-68741In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…9.8
- CVE-2025-68742In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-68743In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-68744In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-68745In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…9.8
- CVE-2025-68746In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
Are you affected by CVE-2025-68740?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
