CVE-2026-126609
Last modified
CVE-2026-126609 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 7.5/10 on the CVSS scale. Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.2.25 through 6.3.7 on Windows, with a PostgreSQL database, the connection's sslmode require, verify-ca or verify-full, and a root certificate file named by PostgreSQLSslRootCert (from 6.2.25) or, with TlsMode=verify-full and neither PostgreSQL key set, by TlsCaFile (from 6.3.4), hands the file's name to libpq as bytes in the system's ANSI code page (up to 6.3.5 as Latin-1 bytes, which on code page 1252 are the code page's own for U+00A0 to U+00FF), and libpq looks for the file by those bytes and then hands the same bytes to OpenSSL, whose file opening on Windows reads a name as UTF-8 first and opens the file at that reading when one is there. When every byte of the name outside ASCII also reads as UTF-8 - for example U+00C3 U+00A9, the bytes C3 A9 on code page 1252, which are U+00E9 in UTF-8 - the database server's certificate was checked against the file at that other name whenever one was there, which allows a local attacker who can create that file but cannot change the configured one, as any user can by default beside a file an administrator keeps under ProgramData, or beside a folder directly under the system drive's root whose permissions the administrator restricted, and who can intercept the connection to the database server or stand in for it, to have hMailServer trust a certificate authority of the attacker's own and read and modify the traffic between hMailServer and its database, the database password included; the file alone, holding no authority that issued the database server's certificate, stops hMailServer from connecting to its database. EPSS estimates a 0.17% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.2.25 through 6.3.7 on Windows, with a PostgreSQL database, the connection's sslmode require, verify-ca or verify-full, and a root certificate file named by PostgreSQLSslRootCert (from 6.2.25) or, with TlsMode=verify-full and neither PostgreSQL key set, by TlsCaFile (from 6.3.4), hands the file's name to libpq as bytes in the system's ANSI code page (up to 6.3.5 as Latin-1 bytes, which on code page 1252 are the code page's own for U+00A0 to U+00FF), and libpq looks for the file by those bytes and then hands the same bytes to OpenSSL, whose file opening on Windows reads a name as UTF-8 first and opens the file at that reading when one is there. When every byte of the name outside ASCII also reads as UTF-8 - for example U+00C3 U+00A9, the bytes C3 A9 on code page 1252, which are U+00E9 in UTF-8 - the database server's certificate was checked against the file at that other name whenever one was there, which allows a local attacker who can create that file but cannot change the configured one, as any user can by default beside a file an administrator keeps under ProgramData, or beside a folder directly under the system drive's root whose permissions the administrator restricted, and who can intercept the connection to the database server or stand in for it, to have hMailServer trust a certificate authority of the attacker's own and read and modify the traffic between hMailServer and its database, the database password included; the file alone, holding no authority that issued the database server's certificate, stops hMailServer from connecting to its database. The same applies in 6.3.4 through 6.3.7 to TlsCaFile when an Oracle MySQL client library has been put in place of the bundled MariaDB Connector/C, since that client opens the file through OpenSSL in the same way; the bundled MariaDB Connector/C opens the file in the code page and is not affected, and neither are the Linux builds. The configuration is not the default: by default no root certificate file is named.
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Progressive Robot Ltd | hMailServer | >= 6.2.25, <= 6.3.7 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Deferred
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-126609?
How severe is CVE-2026-126609?
How do I fix CVE-2026-126609?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-126570Padloc 4.0.0 before 4.3.1 contains a prototype pollution vul…7.6
- CVE-2026-126571Padloc 4.0.0 before 4.3.1 contains an authentication bypass …4.8
- CVE-2026-12659A denial-of-service security issue exists in the affected pr…8.7
- CVE-2026-1266The Postalicious plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Store…4.4
- CVE-2026-12660IBM MQ Web Console could allow an authenticated administrato…2.7
- CVE-2026-126607Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.2.3 through 6.3.7 on Windows…7.8
- CVE-2026-12661A denial-of-service security issue exists within FactoryTalk…4.8
- CVE-2026-126610Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 through 6.3.7, with a My…7.4
- CVE-2026-126611Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 through 6.3.7, with a My…7
- CVE-2026-126612Improper link resolution in the Windows installer of Progres…7.8
- CVE-2026-126613Allocation of resources without limits in the JSON reader of…7.5
- CVE-2026-126614The web services listener of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6…5.3
Are you affected by CVE-2026-126609?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
