CVE-2026-32144
Last modified
CVE-2026-32144 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 7.6/10 on the CVSS scale. Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_ocsp module) allows OCSP designated-responder authorization bypass via missing signature verification. The OCSP response validation in public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 does not verify that a CA-designated responder certificate was cryptographically signed by the issuing CA. Instead, it only checks that the responder certificate's issuer name matches the CA's subject name and that the certificate has the OCSPSigning extended key usage. EPSS estimates a 0.21% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_ocsp module) allows OCSP designated-responder authorization bypass via missing signature verification. The OCSP response validation in public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 does not verify that a CA-designated responder certificate was cryptographically signed by the issuing CA. Instead, it only checks that the responder certificate's issuer name matches the CA's subject name and that the certificate has the OCSPSigning extended key usage. An attacker who can intercept or control OCSP responses can create a self-signed certificate with a matching issuer name and the OCSPSigning EKU, and use it to forge OCSP responses that mark revoked certificates as valid. This affects SSL/TLS clients using OCSP stapling, which may accept connections to servers with revoked certificates, potentially transmitting sensitive data to compromised servers. Applications using the public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 API directly are also affected, with impact depending on usage context. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/public_key/src/pubkey_ocsp.erl and program routines pubkey_ocsp:is_authorized_responder/3. This issue affects OTP from OTP 27.0 until OTP 28.4.2 and 27.3.4.10 corresponding to public_key from 1.16 until 1.20.3 and 1.17.1.2, and ssl from 11.2 until 11.5.4 and 11.2.12.7.
Metrics
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Erlang | Erlang\/Otp | >= 27.0, < 27.3.4.10 |
| Erlang | Erlang\/Otp | >= 28.0, < 28.4.2 |
| Erlang | Erlang\/Public Key | >= 1.16, < 1.17.1.2 |
| Erlang | Erlang\/Public Key | >= 1.18, < 1.20.3 |
| Erlang | Erlang\/Ssl | >= 11.2, < 11.2.12.7 |
| Erlang | Erlang\/Ssl | > 11.3, < 11.5.4 |
References
- https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32144.htmlMitigation, Vendor Advisory
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-gxrm-pf64-99xmMitigation, Third Party Advisory
- https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-32144Third Party Advisory
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Analyzed
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-32144?
How severe is CVE-2026-32144?
How do I fix CVE-2026-32144?
Are you affected by CVE-2026-32144?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
