CVE-2026-34182
Last modified
CVE-2026-34182 is a critical-severity vulnerability rated 9.1/10 on the CVSS scale. Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails to perform sufficient input validation on the cipher and tag length fields of AuthEnvelopedData containers, leading to various potential compromises. Impact Summary: Attackers making use of these vulnerabilities may achieve key-equivalent functionality for a given CMS recipient and/or bypass integrity validation for a given message. In one use case, an attacker may send a CMS message containing AuthEnvelopedData with the cipher specified as a non-AEAD cipher. OpenSSL erroneously allows this selection, and attempts to decrypt and validate the message. An on-path attacker who captures one legitimate AES-GCM AuthEnvelopedData addressed to the victim can re-emit it with the recipientInfos set left byte-for-byte intact, so the victim's private key still unwraps the genuine CEK (the content-encryption key), but with the inner OID rewritten to AES-256-OFB (Output Feedback Mode, an unauthenticated keystream mode) and with an attacker-chosen IV and ciphertext. EPSS estimates a 0.24% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails to perform sufficient input validation on the cipher and tag length fields of AuthEnvelopedData containers, leading to various potential compromises. Impact Summary: Attackers making use of these vulnerabilities may achieve key-equivalent functionality for a given CMS recipient and/or bypass integrity validation for a given message. In one use case, an attacker may send a CMS message containing AuthEnvelopedData with the cipher specified as a non-AEAD cipher. OpenSSL erroneously allows this selection, and attempts to decrypt and validate the message. An on-path attacker who captures one legitimate AES-GCM AuthEnvelopedData addressed to the victim can re-emit it with the recipientInfos set left byte-for-byte intact, so the victim's private key still unwraps the genuine CEK (the content-encryption key), but with the inner OID rewritten to AES-256-OFB (Output Feedback Mode, an unauthenticated keystream mode) and with an attacker-chosen IV and ciphertext. The victim initializes AES-256-OFB under the real CEK, never consults the MAC field, and CMS_decrypt() returns success. If the application under attack responds to the attacker with any indicator showing success or failure of the decryption effort, it is possible for the attacker to use this as an oracle to obtain key equivalent functionality for the CEK used for the chosen recipient of the message. In another use case, an attacker can reduce the tag length of the chosen AEAD cipher for a given AuthEnvelopedData container to be a single byte long, allowing an attacker to brute force CMS decryption, producing an integrity bypass for applications that trust CMS_decrypt() to reject modified content. The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue.
Metrics
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Openssl | Openssl | >= 3.0.0, < 3.0.21 |
| Openssl | Openssl | >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.6 |
| Openssl | Openssl | >= 3.5.0, < 3.5.7 |
| Openssl | Openssl | >= 3.6.0, < 3.6.3 |
| Openssl | Openssl | 4.0.0 |
References
- https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260609.txtVendor Advisory
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Analyzed
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-34182?
How severe is CVE-2026-34182?
How do I fix CVE-2026-34182?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-34177Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.7 contain an incomplet…9.1
- CVE-2026-34178In Canonical LXD before 6.8, the backup import path validate…9.1
- CVE-2026-34179In Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.7, the doCertificat…9.1
- CVE-2026-3418The System REST API accepts user-supplied file uploads witho…9.1
- CVE-2026-34180Issue summary: Parsing a crafted DER-encoded ASN.1 structure…7.5
- CVE-2026-34181Issue Summary: The PKCS#12 file processing fails to perform …7.4
- CVE-2026-34183Issue summary: Remote peer may exhaust heap memory of the QU…7.5
- CVE-2026-34184Hydrosystem Control System does not enforce authorization fo…9.1
- CVE-2026-34185Hydrosystem Control System is vulnerable to SQL Injection ac…8.8
- CVE-2026-34186Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL C…8.8
- CVE-2026-34187Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL C…9.8
- CVE-2026-34188Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Co…7.2
Are you affected by CVE-2026-34182?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
