CVE-2026-42027
Last modified
CVE-2026-42027 is a critical-severity vulnerability rated 9.8/10 on the CVSS scale. Arbitrary Class Instantiation via Model Manifest in Apache OpenNLP ExtensionLoader Versions Affected: before 1.9.5, before 2.5.9, before 3.0.0-M3 Description: The ExtensionLoader.instantiateExtension(Class, String) method loads a class by its fully-qualified name via Class.forName() and invokes its no-arg constructor, with the class name sourced from the manifest.properties entry of a model archive. The existing isAssignableFrom check correctly rejects classes that are not subtypes of the expected extension interface (BaseToolFactory for factory=, ArtifactSerializer for serializer-class-*), but the check runs after Class.forName() has already loaded and initialized the named class. EPSS estimates a 0.69% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
Arbitrary Class Instantiation via Model Manifest in Apache OpenNLP ExtensionLoader Versions Affected: before 1.9.5, before 2.5.9, before 3.0.0-M3 Description: The ExtensionLoader.instantiateExtension(Class, String) method loads a class by its fully-qualified name via Class.forName() and invokes its no-arg constructor, with the class name sourced from the manifest.properties entry of a model archive. The existing isAssignableFrom check correctly rejects classes that are not subtypes of the expected extension interface (BaseToolFactory for factory=, ArtifactSerializer for serializer-class-*), but the check runs after Class.forName() has already loaded and initialized the named class. Class.forName() with default initialization semantics executes the target class's static initializer before returning, so an attacker who can supply a crafted model archive can cause the static initializer of any class on the classpath to run during model loading, regardless of whether that class passes the subsequent type check. Exploitation requires a class with attacker-useful side effects in its static initializer (for example, JNDI lookup, outbound network I/O, or filesystem access) to be present on the classpath, so this is not a drop-in remote code execution; however, the attack surface grows as third-party model distribution becomes more common (community model repositories, Hugging Face-style sharing), where users routinely load model files from origins they do not control. A secondary, narrower vector affects deployments that ship legitimate BaseToolFactory or ArtifactSerializer subclasses with side-effecting no-arg constructors: a malicious manifest can name such a class and force its constructor to run during model load. Mitigation: * 2.x users should upgrade to 2.5.9. * 3.x users should upgrade to 3.0.0-M3. Note: The fix introduces a package-prefix allowlist that is consulted before Class.forName() is invoked, so the static initializer of a disallowed class is never executed. Classes under the opennlp. prefix remain permitted by default. Deployments that load models referencing factories or serializers outside opennlp.* must opt those packages in, either programmatically via ExtensionLoader.registerAllowedPackage(String) before the first model load, or by setting the OPENNLP_EXT_ALLOWED_PACKAGES system property to a comma-separated list of allowed package prefixes. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should ensure that all model files are sourced from trusted origins and should audit their classpath for classes with side-effecting static initializers or constructors, particularly any that perform JNDI lookups, network requests, or filesystem operations during class initialization.
Metrics
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Update |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apache | Opennlp | < 2.5.9 | — |
| Apache | Opennlp | 3.0.0 | M1 |
References
- https://lists.apache.org/thread/ltlo4powjfc0w2w2yyl1o5tc7q1gcb2yMailing List, Vendor Advisory
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/01/20Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-42027?
How severe is CVE-2026-42027?
How do I fix CVE-2026-42027?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-42014A flaw was found in GnuTLS. The `gnutls_pkcs11_token_set_pin…6.6
- CVE-2026-42015A flaw was found in gnutls. An off-by-one error exists in th…5.3
- CVE-2026-42016JFrog Artifactory (Self Hosted) versions before 7.133.11 are…8.8
- CVE-2026-42017An event-handling weakness in JFrog Artifactory could expose…8.8
- CVE-2026-42018JFrog Artifactory could return an internal anonymous-user to…7.5
- CVE-2026-4202The extension fails to verify, if an authenticated user has …4.3
- CVE-2026-42028novaGallery is a php image gallery. Prior to version 2.1.1, …5.3
- CVE-2026-42029Rejected reason: This CVE is a duplicate of another CVE.
- CVE-2026-4203A vulnerability was detected in D-Link DNS-120, DNR-202L, DN…9.8
- CVE-2026-42030MapServer is a system for developing web-based GIS applicati…6.1
- CVE-2026-42031CKAN is an open-source DMS (data management system) for powe…9.8
- CVE-2026-42032CKAN is an open-source DMS (data management system) for powe…9.1
Are you affected by CVE-2026-42027?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
