CVE-2026-45446

Issue summary: The implementations of AES-SIV (RFC 5297) and AES-GCM-SIV (RFC 8452) mishandle the authentication of AAD (Additional Authenticated Data) with an empty ciphertext allowing a forgery of such messages. Impact summary: An attacker can forge empty messages with arbitrary AAD to the victim's application using these ciphers. AES-SIV (RFC 5297) and AES-GCM-SIV (RFC 8452) are nonce-misuse-resistant AEAD modes: they accept a key, nonce, optional AAD (bytes that are authenticated but not encrypted), and plaintext, and produces ciphertext plus a 16-byte tag. On decrypt, `EVP_DecryptFinal_ex()` is documented to return success only if the tag is verified succesfully. In OpenSSL's provider implementation of these ciphers, the expected tag is computed only when decryption function is invoked with non-empty data. If the caller supplies AAD and then calls `EVP_DecryptFinal_ex()` without invocation of the ciphertext update, which can happen when the received ciphertext length is zero, the tag is never recalculated and still holds its all-zeros value. When AES-GCM-SIV is used, an attacker who sends arbitrary AAD, empty ciphertext, and all-zeros tag passes authentication under any key they do not know, single-shot. When AES-SIV is used, for mounting the attack it's necessary for the application to reuse the decryption context without resetting the key. AES-SIV is implemented since OpenSSL 3.0. AES-GCM-SIV is implemented since OpenSSL 3.2. No protocols implemented in OpenSSL itself (TLS/CMS/PKCS7/HPKE/QUIC) support either AES-GCM-SIV or AES-SIV. To mount an attack, the applications must implement their own protocol and use the EVP interface. Also they must skip the ciphertext update when a message with an empty ciphertext arrives. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as these algorithms are not FIPS approved and the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

• CWE-325

• https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/25b32cd9d41d2bc01b6abc425bb4baf2c2236fdcPatch
• https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/71e2a5d263518cf5866043bd60ee4994d59e53a3Patch
• https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7fe3f33a3b3a4c487aa4dcdbc87057f66ffd2b85Patch
• https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/daca0f48e4a69a2892a62262bad59e62a8a76598Patch
• https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/eec5e9bf0d867333b8495e456f5235d225798a68Patch
• https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260609.txtVendor Advisory

Published

Jun 9, 2026

Last Modified

Jul 23, 2026

Status

Analyzed

• How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
• Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
• PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
• AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.

• CVE-2026-4544A vulnerability was determined in Wavlink WL-WN578W2 221110.…4.8
• CVE-2026-45441Unauthenticated Other Vulnerability Type in WpEvently <= 5.3…7.5
• CVE-2026-45442Missing Authorization vulnerability in Brainstorm Force Pres…4.3
• CVE-2026-45443Missing Authorization vulnerability in ADD-ONS.ORG PDF for E…5
• CVE-2026-45444Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerabilit…10
• CVE-2026-45445Issue summary: When an application drives an AES-OCB context…7.5
• CVE-2026-45447Issue summary: A specially crafted PKCS#7 or S/MIME signed m…8.8
• CVE-2026-45448CWE-601 URL redirection to untrusted site ('open redirect')4.3
• CVE-2026-4545A security flaw has been discovered in Flos Freeware Notepad…7.3
• CVE-2026-45453Improper neutralization of input during web page generation …5.4
• CVE-2026-45454Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory …8.8
• CVE-2026-45455Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unaut…4.3