CVE-2026-46247
Last modified
CVE-2026-46247 is a medium-severity vulnerability rated 5.5/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: clk: qcom: gfx3d: add parent to parent request map After commit d228ece36345 ("clk: divider: remove round_rate() in favor of determine_rate()") determining GFX3D clock rate crashes, because the passed parent map doesn't provide the expected best_parent_hw clock (with the roundd_rate path before the offending commit the best_parent_hw was ignored). Set the field in parent_req in addition to setting it in the req, fixing the crash. clk_hw_round_rate (drivers/clk/clk.c:1764) (P) clk_divider_bestdiv (drivers/clk/clk-divider.c:336) divider_determine_rate (drivers/clk/clk-divider.c:358) clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_determine_rate (drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c:1275) clk_core_determine_round_nolock (drivers/clk/clk.c:1606) clk_core_round_rate_nolock (drivers/clk/clk.c:1701) __clk_determine_rate (drivers/clk/clk.c:1741) clk_gfx3d_determine_rate (drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c:1268) clk_core_determine_round_nolock (drivers/clk/clk.c:1606) clk_core_round_rate_nolock (drivers/clk/clk.c:1701) clk_core_round_rate_nolock (drivers/clk/clk.c:1710) clk_round_rate (drivers/clk/clk.c:1804) dev_pm_opp_set_rate (drivers/opp/core.c:1440 (discriminator 1)) msm_devfreq_target (drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c:51) devfreq_set_target (drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c:360) devfreq_update_target (drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c:426) devfreq_monitor (drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c:458) process_one_work (arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h:36 include/trace/events/workqueue.h:110 kernel/workqueue.c:3284) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3356 (discriminator 2) kernel/workqueue.c:3443 (discriminator 2)) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:467) ret_from_fork (arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:861). EPSS estimates a 0.12% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: clk: qcom: gfx3d: add parent to parent request map After commit d228ece36345 ("clk: divider: remove round_rate() in favor of determine_rate()") determining GFX3D clock rate crashes, because the passed parent map doesn't provide the expected best_parent_hw clock (with the roundd_rate path before the offending commit the best_parent_hw was ignored). Set the field in parent_req in addition to setting it in the req, fixing the crash. clk_hw_round_rate (drivers/clk/clk.c:1764) (P) clk_divider_bestdiv (drivers/clk/clk-divider.c:336) divider_determine_rate (drivers/clk/clk-divider.c:358) clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_determine_rate (drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c:1275) clk_core_determine_round_nolock (drivers/clk/clk.c:1606) clk_core_round_rate_nolock (drivers/clk/clk.c:1701) __clk_determine_rate (drivers/clk/clk.c:1741) clk_gfx3d_determine_rate (drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c:1268) clk_core_determine_round_nolock (drivers/clk/clk.c:1606) clk_core_round_rate_nolock (drivers/clk/clk.c:1701) clk_core_round_rate_nolock (drivers/clk/clk.c:1710) clk_round_rate (drivers/clk/clk.c:1804) dev_pm_opp_set_rate (drivers/opp/core.c:1440 (discriminator 1)) msm_devfreq_target (drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c:51) devfreq_set_target (drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c:360) devfreq_update_target (drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c:426) devfreq_monitor (drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c:458) process_one_work (arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h:36 include/trace/events/workqueue.h:110 kernel/workqueue.c:3284) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3356 (discriminator 2) kernel/workqueue.c:3443 (discriminator 2)) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:467) ret_from_fork (arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:861)
Metrics
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 4.5, < 6.1.165 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.2, < 6.6.128 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.7, < 6.12.75 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.13, < 6.18.14 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.19, < 6.19.4 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Analyzed
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-46247?
How severe is CVE-2026-46247?
How do I fix CVE-2026-46247?
Are you affected by CVE-2026-46247?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
