CVE-2026-52994
Last modified
CVE-2026-52994 is a medium-severity vulnerability rated 5.5/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vsock/virtio: fix MSG_ZEROCOPY pinned-pages accounting virtio_transport_init_zcopy_skb() uses iter->count as the size argument for msg_zerocopy_realloc(), which in turn passes it to mm_account_pinned_pages() for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK accounting. However, this function is called after virtio_transport_fill_skb() has already consumed the iterator via __zerocopy_sg_from_iter(), so on the last skb, iter->count will be 0, skipping the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK enforcement. Pass pkt_len (the total bytes being sent) as an explicit parameter to virtio_transport_init_zcopy_skb() instead of reading the already-consumed iter->count. This matches TCP and UDP, which both call msg_zerocopy_realloc() with the original message size.. EPSS estimates a 0.17% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vsock/virtio: fix MSG_ZEROCOPY pinned-pages accounting virtio_transport_init_zcopy_skb() uses iter->count as the size argument for msg_zerocopy_realloc(), which in turn passes it to mm_account_pinned_pages() for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK accounting. However, this function is called after virtio_transport_fill_skb() has already consumed the iterator via __zerocopy_sg_from_iter(), so on the last skb, iter->count will be 0, skipping the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK enforcement. Pass pkt_len (the total bytes being sent) as an explicit parameter to virtio_transport_init_zcopy_skb() instead of reading the already-consumed iter->count. This matches TCP and UDP, which both call msg_zerocopy_realloc() with the original message size.
Metrics
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.7, < 6.18.33 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.19, < 7.0.10 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Analyzed
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-52994?
How severe is CVE-2026-52994?
How do I fix CVE-2026-52994?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-52989In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…9.8
- CVE-2026-5299ICMPv6 PvD protocol dissector crash in Wireshark 4.6.0 to 4.…5.5
- CVE-2026-52990In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-52991In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-52992In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-52993In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…9.8
- CVE-2026-52995In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-52996In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-52997In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-52998In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.5
- CVE-2026-52999In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…9.1
- CVE-2026-5300Unauthenticated functionality in CoolerControl/coolercontro…9.1
Are you affected by CVE-2026-52994?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
