CVE-2026-59250
Last modified
CVE-2026-59250 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 8.3/10 on the CVSS scale. Classic buffer overflow in the Erlang/OTP megaco flex scanner C driver allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to corrupt the driver's memory (and potentially achieve remote code execution or a denial-of-service crash) by sending a single text-encoded H.248/Megaco message containing an oversized property parm name. When tokenizing a Local/Remote descriptor, mfs_load_property_groups extracts the attacker-controlled property name (bounded only by the message length) and, when no value follows, formats it into a fixed 512-byte error_msg field of the MfsErlDrvData struct using an unchecked sprintf call. Names longer than roughly 452 bytes overflow into the immediately following struct fields (text_buf, text_ptr, term_spec, term_spec_size, term_spec_index), overwriting live pointers and counters with attacker-chosen bytes. EPSS estimates a 0.73% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
Classic buffer overflow in the Erlang/OTP megaco flex scanner C driver allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to corrupt the driver's memory (and potentially achieve remote code execution or a denial-of-service crash) by sending a single text-encoded H.248/Megaco message containing an oversized property parm name. When tokenizing a Local/Remote descriptor, mfs_load_property_groups extracts the attacker-controlled property name (bounded only by the message length) and, when no value follows, formats it into a fixed 512-byte error_msg field of the MfsErlDrvData struct using an unchecked sprintf call. Names longer than roughly 452 bytes overflow into the immediately following struct fields (text_buf, text_ptr, term_spec, term_spec_size, term_spec_index), overwriting live pointers and counters with attacker-chosen bytes. Subsequent scanner code writes and frees through the corrupted pointers, producing arbitrary write and arbitrary free primitives inside the BEAM VM process, which can be leveraged for remote code execution. On builds compiled with _FORTIFY_SOURCE the overflow is detected at runtime and terminates the process with SIGABRT, resulting in denial of service. The overflow occurs in the flex scanner before any grammar or Megaco-level authentication processing, so exploitation requires only network reachability to the megaco transport port on a node configured with {scanner, flex}. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/megaco/src/flex/megaco_flex_scanner_drv.flex.src and program routines mfs_load_property_groups. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 29.0.4, OTP 28.5.0.4 and OTP 27.3.4.15, corresponding to megaco from 3.17.1 before 4.9.1, 4.8.3.1 and 4.7.2.2. Versions prior to OTP 17.0 are also affected but are not listed because the OTP version scheme is only defined from OTP 17.0 onwards.
Metrics
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Erlang | OTP | >= 3.17.1, < * |
| Erlang | OTP | >= R13B03, < *; >= 84adefa331c4159d432d22840663c38f155cd4c1, < 8704c8f550a11ed5f825e3c011ecb03565b79c4f |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Awaiting Analysis
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-59250?
How severe is CVE-2026-59250?
How do I fix CVE-2026-59250?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-59244Apache Airflow's secrets masker did not mask `var.json` Vari…
- CVE-2026-59245In the Apache Airflow FAB auth manager, a DAG whose `dag_id`…8.1
- CVE-2026-59246Allocation of resources without limits vulnerability in elix…6.3
- CVE-2026-59247Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability…7.6
- CVE-2026-59248Allocation of resources without limits vulnerability in nine…8.7
- CVE-2026-59249Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests (HTTP response …6.3
- CVE-2026-59251Allocation of resources without limits in Erlang/OTP public_…7.5
- CVE-2026-59252Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in ZenHiv…8.2
- CVE-2026-59253n8n before 2.28.0 contains an improper authorization vulnera…5
- CVE-2026-59254n8n before 2.28.1 contains an information disclosure vulnera…6.3
- CVE-2026-59255BloodHound through 9.4.0, fixed in commit 8f79035, contains …7.1
- CVE-2026-59257n8n before 1.123.61, 2.x before 2.27.4, and 2.28.x before 2.…8.8
Are you affected by CVE-2026-59250?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
