CVE-2026-63985
Last modified
CVE-2026-63985 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 7.8/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ethtool: eeprom: add more safeties to EEPROM Netlink fallback The Netlink fallback path for reading module EEPROM (fallback_set_params()) validates that offset < eeprom_len, but does not check that offset + length stays within eeprom_len. The ioctl equivalent (ethtool_get_any_eeprom() in ioctl.c) has always enforced both bounds: if (eeprom.offset + eeprom.len > total_len) return -EINVAL; This could lead to surprises in both drivers and device FW. Add the missing offset + length validation to fallback_set_params(), mirroring the ioctl. Similarly - ethtool core in general, and ethtool_get_any_eeprom() in particular tries to zero-init all buffers passed to the drivers to avoid any extra work of zeroing things out. eeprom_fallback() uses a plain kmalloc(), change it to zalloc.. EPSS estimates a 0.13% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ethtool: eeprom: add more safeties to EEPROM Netlink fallback The Netlink fallback path for reading module EEPROM (fallback_set_params()) validates that offset < eeprom_len, but does not check that offset + length stays within eeprom_len. The ioctl equivalent (ethtool_get_any_eeprom() in ioctl.c) has always enforced both bounds: if (eeprom.offset + eeprom.len > total_len) return -EINVAL; This could lead to surprises in both drivers and device FW. Add the missing offset + length validation to fallback_set_params(), mirroring the ioctl. Similarly - ethtool core in general, and ethtool_get_any_eeprom() in particular tries to zero-init all buffers passed to the drivers to avoid any extra work of zeroing things out. eeprom_fallback() uses a plain kmalloc(), change it to zalloc.
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Update |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 5.13, < 5.15.210 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 5.16, < 6.1.176 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.2, < 6.6.143 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.7, < 6.12.93 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.13, < 6.18.35 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.19, < 7.0.12 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 7.1 | Rc1 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-63985?
How severe is CVE-2026-63985?
How do I fix CVE-2026-63985?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-6398Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMB…
- CVE-2026-63980In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.5
- CVE-2026-63981In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-63982In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-63983In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-63984In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…9.8
- CVE-2026-63986In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-63987In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-63988In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-63989In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-6399The General Options plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to St…4.4
- CVE-2026-63990In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
Are you affected by CVE-2026-63985?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
