CVE-2026-64352
Last modified
CVE-2026-64352 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs trie_lookup_elem() annotates its rcu_dereference_check() walks with only rcu_read_lock_bh_held(). Because rcu_dereference_check(p, c) resolves to "c || rcu_read_lock_held()", this passes for XDP/NAPI and classic RCU readers but fails for sleepable BPF programs, which enter via __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable() and hold only rcu_read_lock_trace(). trie_update_elem() and trie_delete_elem() have the same problem in a different form: they walk the trie with plain rcu_dereference(), which asserts rcu_read_lock_held() unconditionally. EPSS estimates a 0.17% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs trie_lookup_elem() annotates its rcu_dereference_check() walks with only rcu_read_lock_bh_held(). Because rcu_dereference_check(p, c) resolves to "c || rcu_read_lock_held()", this passes for XDP/NAPI and classic RCU readers but fails for sleepable BPF programs, which enter via __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable() and hold only rcu_read_lock_trace(). trie_update_elem() and trie_delete_elem() have the same problem in a different form: they walk the trie with plain rcu_dereference(), which asserts rcu_read_lock_held() unconditionally. Both are reachable from sleepable BPF programs via the bpf_map_update_elem / bpf_map_delete_elem helpers, and from the syscall path under classic rcu_read_lock(). In the writer paths the trie is actually protected by trie->lock (an rqspinlock taken across the walk); we never relied on the RCU read-side lock to keep nodes alive there. A sleepable LSM hook that ends up touching an LPM trie therefore triggers lockdep on debug kernels: ============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 7.1.0-... Tainted: G E ----------------------------- kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:249 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! 1 lock held by net_tests/540: #0: (rcu_tasks_trace_srcu_struct){....}-{0:0}, at: __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable+0x26/0x280 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl lockdep_rcu_suspicious trie_lookup_elem bpf_prog_..._enforce_security_socket_connect bpf_trampoline_... security_socket_connect __sys_connect do_syscall_64 This is lockdep-only -- no UAF, since Tasks Trace RCU does serialize against the trie's reclaim path -- but it spams the console once per distinct callsite on every debug kernel running a sleepable BPF LSM that touches an LPM trie, which is increasingly common. For the lookup path, switch the rcu_dereference_check() annotation from rcu_read_lock_bh_held() to bpf_rcu_lock_held(), which accepts all three contexts (classic, BH, Tasks Trace). Other map types already follow this convention. For trie_update_elem() and trie_delete_elem(), annotate the walks as rcu_dereference_protected(*p, 1) -- matching trie_free() in the same file -- since trie->lock is held across the walk. rqspinlock has no lockdep_map, so the predicate degenerates to '1' rather than lockdep_is_held(&trie->lock); the protection is real but not machine-verifiable. trie_get_next_key() also uses bare rcu_dereference() but is reachable only from the BPF syscall, which holds classic rcu_read_lock() before dispatching, so it is left untouched.
Metrics
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= 694cea395fded425008e93cd90cfdf7a451674af, < f0967d4f1ba4323a3cb7dc8fdba74dd3a8caaf04; >= 694cea395fded425008e93cd90cfdf7a451674af, < 304ca50582f0c047370f85e13caec456f78c9fcc; >= 694cea395fded425008e93cd90cfdf7a451674af, < ec662a8b2cde01e76b37ccd4b992d0342299e69c; >= 694cea395fded425008e93cd90cfdf7a451674af, < 9bfdf4b81b0e56d47bc6c46c34a46638be716695; >= 694cea395fded425008e93cd90cfdf7a451674af, < 57454944737f3ad9a8703aecbbb79713b513a94b; >= 694cea395fded425008e93cd90cfdf7a451674af, < bd6ad9a6b30498d845413e863fb95c6fab3babe3; >= 694cea395fded425008e93cd90cfdf7a451674af, < 2f884d371fafea137afea504d49ee4a7c8d7985b |
| Linux | Linux | 5.14 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Awaiting Analysis
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-64352?
How severe is CVE-2026-64352?
How do I fix CVE-2026-64352?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-64346In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64347In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64348In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64349In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64350In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64351In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64353In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64354In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-64355In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…9.8
- CVE-2026-64356In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64357In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64358In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
Are you affected by CVE-2026-64352?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
