CVE-2026-64496
Last modified
CVE-2026-64496 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 7.1/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iio: event: Fix event FIFO reset race `iio_event_getfd()` creates the event file descriptor with `anon_inode_getfd()`, which allocates a new fd, creates the anonymous file and installs it in the process fd table before returning to the caller. The IIO code resets the event FIFO after `anon_inode_getfd()` has returned, but before `IIO_GET_EVENT_FD_IOCTL` has copied the fd number to userspace. But since fd tables are shared between threads, another thread can guess the newly allocated fd number and issue a `read()` on it as soon as the fd has been installed. This means the `kfifo_to_user()` in `iio_event_chrdev_read()` can run in parallel with the `kfifo_reset_out()` in `iio_event_getfd()`. The kfifo documentation says that `kfifo_reset_out()` is only safe when it is called from the reader thread and there is only one concurrent reader. Otherwise it is dangerous and must be handled in the same way as `kfifo_reset()`. If that happens, `kfifo_to_user()` can advance the FIFO `out` index based on state from before the reset, after the reset has already moved the `out` index to the current `in` index. That can leave the FIFO with an `out` index past the `in` index. EPSS estimates a 0.18% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iio: event: Fix event FIFO reset race `iio_event_getfd()` creates the event file descriptor with `anon_inode_getfd()`, which allocates a new fd, creates the anonymous file and installs it in the process fd table before returning to the caller. The IIO code resets the event FIFO after `anon_inode_getfd()` has returned, but before `IIO_GET_EVENT_FD_IOCTL` has copied the fd number to userspace. But since fd tables are shared between threads, another thread can guess the newly allocated fd number and issue a `read()` on it as soon as the fd has been installed. This means the `kfifo_to_user()` in `iio_event_chrdev_read()` can run in parallel with the `kfifo_reset_out()` in `iio_event_getfd()`. The kfifo documentation says that `kfifo_reset_out()` is only safe when it is called from the reader thread and there is only one concurrent reader. Otherwise it is dangerous and must be handled in the same way as `kfifo_reset()`. If that happens, `kfifo_to_user()` can advance the FIFO `out` index based on state from before the reset, after the reset has already moved the `out` index to the current `in` index. That can leave the FIFO with an `out` index past the `in` index. A later `read()` can then see an underflowed FIFO length and copy more data than the event FIFO buffer contains. This can result in an out-of-bounds read and leak adjacent kernel memory to userspace. Move the FIFO reset before `anon_inode_getfd()`. At that point the event fd is marked busy, but the new fd has not been installed yet, so userspace cannot access it while the FIFO is reset.
Metrics
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774, < 9dc84ba4be5bbeb29ee49efe6cea2cb32c461424; >= b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774, < d16a702ca7d29c0b7a9b509339d1b044a1cadb32; >= b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774, < a13ef1adbc62085b21b546b07b0be7e2fbf52150; >= b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774, < 0d4a646d7f87ea3625fafe387043fddc6a2f5e7f; >= b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774, < 72c6aa8e0d74eab91b8694cde97dec088c248fee; >= b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774, < 9edefd4c56bee3fe331e0355d1f10a533134999d; >= b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774, < f187dc5a4c4846ffa07d9bda6e760837ed005574; >= b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774, < af791d295737ea6b6ff2c8d8488462a49c14af01 |
| Linux | Linux | 3.15 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-64496?
How severe is CVE-2026-64496?
How do I fix CVE-2026-64496?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-64490In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.4
- CVE-2026-64491In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64492In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64493In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64494In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64495In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64497In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64498In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64499In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-6450A CRL critical extension bypass exists in ParseCRL_Extension…5.3
- CVE-2026-64500In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64501In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.1
Are you affected by CVE-2026-64496?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
