CVE-2026-64496
Last modified
CVE-2026-64496 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 7.1/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iio: event: Fix event FIFO reset race `iio_event_getfd()` creates the event file descriptor with `anon_inode_getfd()`, which allocates a new fd, creates the anonymous file and installs it in the process fd table before returning to the caller. The IIO code resets the event FIFO after `anon_inode_getfd()` has returned, but before `IIO_GET_EVENT_FD_IOCTL` has copied the fd number to userspace. But since fd tables are shared between threads, another thread can guess the newly allocated fd number and issue a `read()` on it as soon as the fd has been installed. This means the `kfifo_to_user()` in `iio_event_chrdev_read()` can run in parallel with the `kfifo_reset_out()` in `iio_event_getfd()`. The kfifo documentation says that `kfifo_reset_out()` is only safe when it is called from the reader thread and there is only one concurrent reader. Otherwise it is dangerous and must be handled in the same way as `kfifo_reset()`. If that happens, `kfifo_to_user()` can advance the FIFO `out` index based on state from before the reset, after the reset has already moved the `out` index to the current `in` index. That can leave the FIFO with an `out` index past the `in` index. EPSS estimates a 0.13% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iio: event: Fix event FIFO reset race `iio_event_getfd()` creates the event file descriptor with `anon_inode_getfd()`, which allocates a new fd, creates the anonymous file and installs it in the process fd table before returning to the caller. The IIO code resets the event FIFO after `anon_inode_getfd()` has returned, but before `IIO_GET_EVENT_FD_IOCTL` has copied the fd number to userspace. But since fd tables are shared between threads, another thread can guess the newly allocated fd number and issue a `read()` on it as soon as the fd has been installed. This means the `kfifo_to_user()` in `iio_event_chrdev_read()` can run in parallel with the `kfifo_reset_out()` in `iio_event_getfd()`. The kfifo documentation says that `kfifo_reset_out()` is only safe when it is called from the reader thread and there is only one concurrent reader. Otherwise it is dangerous and must be handled in the same way as `kfifo_reset()`. If that happens, `kfifo_to_user()` can advance the FIFO `out` index based on state from before the reset, after the reset has already moved the `out` index to the current `in` index. That can leave the FIFO with an `out` index past the `in` index. A later `read()` can then see an underflowed FIFO length and copy more data than the event FIFO buffer contains. This can result in an out-of-bounds read and leak adjacent kernel memory to userspace. Move the FIFO reset before `anon_inode_getfd()`. At that point the event fd is marked busy, but the new fd has not been installed yet, so userspace cannot access it while the FIFO is reset.
Metrics
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774, < 9dc84ba4be5bbeb29ee49efe6cea2cb32c461424; >= b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774, < d16a702ca7d29c0b7a9b509339d1b044a1cadb32; >= b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774, < a13ef1adbc62085b21b546b07b0be7e2fbf52150; >= b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774, < 0d4a646d7f87ea3625fafe387043fddc6a2f5e7f; >= b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774, < 72c6aa8e0d74eab91b8694cde97dec088c248fee; >= b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774, < 9edefd4c56bee3fe331e0355d1f10a533134999d; >= b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774, < f187dc5a4c4846ffa07d9bda6e760837ed005574; >= b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774, < af791d295737ea6b6ff2c8d8488462a49c14af01 |
| Linux | Linux | 3.15 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-64496?
How severe is CVE-2026-64496?
How do I fix CVE-2026-64496?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-64490In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.4
- CVE-2026-64491In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64492In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64493In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64494In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64495In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64497In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64498In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64499In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-6450A CRL critical extension bypass exists in ParseCRL_Extension…5.3
- CVE-2026-64500In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-64501In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.1
Are you affected by CVE-2026-64496?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
