CVE-2026-68292
Last modified
CVE-2026-68292 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ice: prevent tstamp ring allocation for non-PF VSI types The pf->txtime_txqs bitmap tracks which Tx queues have ETF (Earliest TxTime First) offload enabled. This bitmap is indexed by queue number and is set by ice_offload_txtime(), which only operates on PF VSI queues. However, ice_is_txtime_ena() does not check the VSI type before consulting the bitmap.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ice: prevent tstamp ring allocation for non-PF VSI types The pf->txtime_txqs bitmap tracks which Tx queues have ETF (Earliest TxTime First) offload enabled. This bitmap is indexed by queue number and is set by ice_offload_txtime(), which only operates on PF VSI queues. However, ice_is_txtime_ena() does not check the VSI type before consulting the bitmap. When ETF offload is enabled on PF Tx queue 0, bit 0 is set in pf->txtime_txqs. During a subsequent PCI reset rebuild, the CTRL VSI's Tx queue 0 is reconfigured and ice_is_txtime_ena() is called for that ring. Since it only checks pf->txtime_txqs by queue index without distinguishing VSI type, it finds bit 0 set and returns true, matching the PF VSI's ETF queue, not the CTRL VSI's. This causes ice_vsi_cfg_txq() to spuriously allocate a tstamp_ring for the CTRL VSI ring. Since CTRL VSI rings have no associated netdev, ice_clean_tx_ring() takes an early return at the !netdev check before reaching ice_free_tx_tstamp_ring(), leaking the allocation. Each PCI reset leaks one 64-byte tstamp_ring. Fix this by restricting ice_is_txtime_ena() to return true only for PF VSI rings, since txtime_txqs is only meaningful for PF VSI queues.
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= ccde82e909467abdf098a8ee6f63e1ecf9a47ce5, < 684d4d0bda95a3fb21b3e29ff0f668f657707b54; >= ccde82e909467abdf098a8ee6f63e1ecf9a47ce5, < d0a21604c6abfa4956f3a511a1de174cec77a812; >= ccde82e909467abdf098a8ee6f63e1ecf9a47ce5, < 144539bbfd3cea1ab0fb6f5216d6004c1f4f029b |
| Linux | Linux | 6.18 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-68292?
How severe is CVE-2026-68292?
How do I fix CVE-2026-68292?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-68287In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68288In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68289In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-6829nesquena hermes-webui contains a trust-boundary failure vuln…6.3
- CVE-2026-68290In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68291In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68293In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68294In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68295In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68296In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68297In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68298In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
Are you affected by CVE-2026-68292?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
