CVE-2026-68326
Last modified
CVE-2026-68326 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mwifiex: bound uAP association event IEs to the event buffer mwifiex_process_uap_event() handles EVENT_UAP_STA_ASSOC by exposing the (re)association request IEs that the firmware copies into the event: sinfo->assoc_req_ies = &event->data[len]; len = (u8 *)sinfo->assoc_req_ies - (u8 *)&event->frame_control; sinfo->assoc_req_ies_len = le16_to_cpu(event->len) - (u16)len; event->len is supplied by the device firmware and is never validated, and the subtraction is unchecked. assoc_req_ies points into adapter->event_body[MAX_EVENT_SIZE], a fixed-size array embedded in the kmalloc()'d struct mwifiex_adapter. On the ap_11n_enabled path mwifiex_set_sta_ht_cap() walks these IEs with cfg80211_find_ie(), whose for_each_element() loop dereferences each element header.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mwifiex: bound uAP association event IEs to the event buffer mwifiex_process_uap_event() handles EVENT_UAP_STA_ASSOC by exposing the (re)association request IEs that the firmware copies into the event: sinfo->assoc_req_ies = &event->data[len]; len = (u8 *)sinfo->assoc_req_ies - (u8 *)&event->frame_control; sinfo->assoc_req_ies_len = le16_to_cpu(event->len) - (u16)len; event->len is supplied by the device firmware and is never validated, and the subtraction is unchecked. assoc_req_ies points into adapter->event_body[MAX_EVENT_SIZE], a fixed-size array embedded in the kmalloc()'d struct mwifiex_adapter. On the ap_11n_enabled path mwifiex_set_sta_ht_cap() walks these IEs with cfg80211_find_ie(), whose for_each_element() loop dereferences each element header. A firmware-reported event->len larger than the bytes actually received makes assoc_req_ies_len describe IEs that extend past event_body, so the walk reads out of the adapter slab object, a slab-out-of-bounds read (KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in cfg80211_find_ie). An event->len smaller than the header instead makes the int subtraction negative, which wraps to a huge size_t when stored in assoc_req_ies_len. The same length is handed to cfg80211_new_sta(), so a more modest over-claim can also copy stale event_body bytes into the NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION notification. A malicious or malfunctioning mwifiex device (USB/SDIO/PCIe) can deliver such an event while the interface is in AP/uAP mode. Validate event->len before use: reject a length that underflows the header or that would place the IEs outside the event_body[] buffer the event was copied into. event->len here is struct mwifiex_assoc_event.len, a payload field internal to this event, not the transport frame length, so it is validated in this handler rather than at the generic MWIFIEX_TYPE_EVENT receive path, which only sees the event cause and the transport frame length. The bound is against event_body[MAX_EVENT_SIZE] rather than the actually-received length because the transports store the event differently (USB and SDIO leave the 4-byte event header in event_skb, PCIe strips it via skb_pull), whereas event_body is the single fixed buffer all of them copy the event into. This is the event-path analogue of the receive-path bounds checks added in commit 119585281617 ("wifi: mwifiex: Fix OOB and integer underflow when rx packets").
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= e568634ae7ac379661c90731d480e067929420a1, < a3f47d7c75ddad1a14621a309286f9fae3cba191; >= e568634ae7ac379661c90731d480e067929420a1, < ad26c75ae25749313248f06510ebe43b5bf4adcc; >= e568634ae7ac379661c90731d480e067929420a1, < d21464d93f8ba464dc3d7b4b31c6e0adcd9f659c; >= e568634ae7ac379661c90731d480e067929420a1, < b6766d7ea43edf5de9d5a572bc58b631d09efe4b; >= e568634ae7ac379661c90731d480e067929420a1, < f0858bfc7d3cab411a447b88e3ef970e575032c9 |
| Linux | Linux | 3.5 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-68326?
How severe is CVE-2026-68326?
How do I fix CVE-2026-68326?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-68320In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68321In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68322In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68323In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68324In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68325In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68327In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68328In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68329In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-6833The a+HRD developed by aEnrich has a SQL Injection vulnerabi…7.1
- CVE-2026-68330In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-68331In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
Are you affected by CVE-2026-68326?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
