CVE-2026-7007
Last modified
CVE-2026-7007 is a medium-severity vulnerability rated 4.6/10 on the CVSS scale. The Zephyr ext2 file system validates the on-disk superblock in ext2_verify_disk_superblock() (subsys/fs/ext2/ext2_impl.c) before completing a mount. The validator checked the magic number, block size, revision and feature flags, but did not verify that the on-disk fields s_blocks_per_group and s_inodes_per_group are non-zero. EPSS estimates a 0.22% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
The Zephyr ext2 file system validates the on-disk superblock in ext2_verify_disk_superblock() (subsys/fs/ext2/ext2_impl.c) before completing a mount. The validator checked the magic number, block size, revision and feature flags, but did not verify that the on-disk fields s_blocks_per_group and s_inodes_per_group are non-zero. Both fields are read directly from the image and are later used as divisors during mount-time initialization. During mount, get_ngroups() divides and modulos s_blocks_count by s_blocks_per_group (reached via ext2_fetch_block_group() from ext2_init_fs()), and get_itable_entry() divides (ino - 1) by s_inodes_per_group when fetching the root inode (both in subsys/fs/ext2/ext2_diskops.c). A superblock with either field set to zero therefore causes an integer division by zero during the mount sequence. An attacker who can present a crafted ext2 image to a device that mounts ext2 — removable media such as an SD card or a USB mass-storage device — can trigger this. On ARMv7-M / ARMv8-M-mainline Cortex-M targets, divide-by-zero trapping is enabled (SCB_CCR_DIV_0_TRP), so the division raises a UsageFault that Zephyr treats as a fatal error, producing a denial of service. The impact is limited to availability; the malformed value is consumed only as a divisor. The fix rejects a zero s_blocks_per_group or s_inodes_per_group in the superblock validator, returning -EINVAL so the mount fails before any block-group or inode I/O occurs.
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Zephyrproject | Zephyr | >= 3.5.0, < 4.5.0 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Analyzed
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-7007?
How severe is CVE-2026-7007?
How do I fix CVE-2026-7007?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-70009Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory …9.8
- CVE-2026-7001A vulnerability was found in Datacom DM4100 1.3.6.1.4.1.3709…2.4
- CVE-2026-70019Windows hard link in Windows Compressed Folder allows an una…6.5
- CVE-2026-7002A vulnerability was determined in KLiK SocialMediaWebsite up…7.3
- CVE-2026-7006Sublime Text for Windows through Build 4192 (Sublime Text 4)…7.3
- CVE-2026-70065Missing release of memory after effective lifetime in Window…7.5
- CVE-2026-7009When curl is told to use the Certificate Status Request TLS …5.3
- CVE-2026-70091Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper syn…5.9
- CVE-2026-7010HTTP::Tiny versions before 0.093 for Perl do not validate CR…6.5
- CVE-2026-70105Improper input validation in Microsoft Office Word allows an…7.5
- CVE-2026-7011A weakness has been identified in MaxSite CMS up to 109.3. A…2.4
- CVE-2026-7012A vulnerability was detected in MaxSite CMS up to 109.3. Thi…2.4
Are you affected by CVE-2026-7007?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
