CVE-2026-71884

In Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, the native one-shot CTR packet cipher did not check that the requested input length fitted the counter space the IV left. In CTR mode the IV and the block counter share one 16-byte block, so an IV of 13 to 15 bytes leaves a counter of only 1 to 3 bytes, addressing 256, 65536 or 16777216 blocks respectively. Given a longer input the counter wrapped and the keystream repeated from the start of the same packet, and the call then returned the full input length as though every byte had been correctly transformed. Two segments of the message were therefore encrypted under the same keystream, so their plaintexts can be recovered from the ciphertext alone, without the key, while the caller saw neither an exception nor a short length to indicate it. The streaming implementation validates at init and again while processing, and the portable AESCTRPacketCipher rejects such a request with "Counter in CTR/SIC mode out of range.", but the native one-shot path has a single entry point and performed no counter-range validation there. It now preflights the IV-derived counter range and rejects an over-long request before any output is written, so the operation is failure-atomic and never reports success for bytes it did not correctly transform. A counter of four bytes or more cannot be exhausted by a Java int length and is unaffected, as is a full 16-byte IV, where the counter range is the caller's responsibility. Bouncy Castle for Java (bcprov) is not affected, as it ships no native implementations.

• CWE-323

• https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/wiki/CVE%E2%80%902026%E2%80%9071884

Published

Oct 9, 2026

Last Modified

Oct 15, 2026

Status

Awaiting Analysis

• How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
• Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
• PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
• AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.

• CVE-2026-71878Missing authentication in initial setup functionality left e…9.2
• CVE-2026-71879Missing authentication in initial setup functionality left e…9.1
• CVE-2026-7188Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL c…9.8
• CVE-2026-71880Interpretation of untrusted input in template engine in GBIF…7.6
• CVE-2026-71881Multiple injection issues in resource metadata fields in GBI…4.8
• CVE-2026-71883In Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, the one-shot n…8.2
• CVE-2026-71885In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the Messaging Layer S…9.2
• CVE-2026-71886In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the high-level OpenPG…8.2
• CVE-2026-71887In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the high-level OpenPG…8.2
• CVE-2026-71888In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the streaming CMS Aut…8.7
• CVE-2026-71889In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, neither copy of PKIXC…8.7
• CVE-2026-7189Insertion of sensitive information into sent data vulnerabil…7.5