CVE-2026-80575
Last modified
CVE-2026-80575 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 7.8/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: cs40l50-vibra - validate custom data from user space cs40l50_add() copies the custom data of an FF_PERIODIC/FF_CUSTOM effect straight from the ff_effect the user passed to EVIOCSFF, without requiring it to hold anything: work_data.custom_data = memdup_array_user(periodic->custom_data, periodic->custom_len, sizeof(s16)); work_data.custom_len = periodic->custom_len; The driver then reads two words out of that buffer: custom_data[0] as the waveform bank in cs40l50_effect_bank_set(), and custom_data[1] as the index within the bank in cs40l50_effect_index_set(). Neither read is covered by a length check, and custom_len is fully user controlled: - custom_len == 0 makes memdup_array_user() call memdup_user() with a length of zero, which returns ZERO_SIZE_PTR rather than an error, so custom_data[0] dereferences it. - custom_len == 1 allocates two bytes.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: cs40l50-vibra - validate custom data from user space cs40l50_add() copies the custom data of an FF_PERIODIC/FF_CUSTOM effect straight from the ff_effect the user passed to EVIOCSFF, without requiring it to hold anything: work_data.custom_data = memdup_array_user(periodic->custom_data, periodic->custom_len, sizeof(s16)); work_data.custom_len = periodic->custom_len; The driver then reads two words out of that buffer: custom_data[0] as the waveform bank in cs40l50_effect_bank_set(), and custom_data[1] as the index within the bank in cs40l50_effect_index_set(). Neither read is covered by a length check, and custom_len is fully user controlled: - custom_len == 0 makes memdup_array_user() call memdup_user() with a length of zero, which returns ZERO_SIZE_PTR rather than an error, so custom_data[0] dereferences it. - custom_len == 1 allocates two bytes. A bank of ROM or RAM keeps effect->type out of the OWT case, and custom_data[1] is then read one word past the allocation. The bank value itself is also mishandled. It is masked with CS40L50_CUSTOM_DATA_MASK (0xffff) but stored in an s16, so a custom_data[0] of 0x8000 or above wraps to a negative value that passes the "bank_type >= CS40L50_WVFRM_BANK_NUM" test. cs40l50_effect_index_set() indexes vib->dsp.banks[] with it before the switch statement's default case gets a chance to reject it: base_index = vib->dsp.banks[effect->type].base_index; max_index = vib->dsp.banks[effect->type].max_index; Require the two words the driver reads to be present, and hold the masked bank in a u32 so the existing upper-bound test covers the whole range. The da7280 haptic driver already range checks custom_len this way.
Metrics
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= c38fe1bb5d21c2ce0857965ee06174ee587d6b42, < 3855b6a11f8a7aceb8181cc08c99afef58517006; >= c38fe1bb5d21c2ce0857965ee06174ee587d6b42, < 52a818c586ae2c36b7324bfaefb547f5e866a8ae; >= c38fe1bb5d21c2ce0857965ee06174ee587d6b42, < d38554602a0b04e85fad28ce72c7500cf50d419b; >= c38fe1bb5d21c2ce0857965ee06174ee587d6b42, < 7d5c576cb1c86047b1fcb1aa9532e17fc5e46c1d |
| Linux | Linux | 6.11 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-80575?
How severe is CVE-2026-80575?
How do I fix CVE-2026-80575?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-80568In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-80569In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-80570In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-80572In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-80573In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-80574In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.4
- CVE-2026-80576In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.8
- CVE-2026-80578In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.3
- CVE-2026-80579In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-8058IBM OPENBMC FW1110.00 through FW1110.20, and FW1060.00 throu…4.5
- CVE-2026-80580In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-80581In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
Are you affected by CVE-2026-80575?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
