Strix
63.2K

CVE-2026-80876

Unknown

Last modified

CVE-2026-80876 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ring-buffer: Fix event length with forced 8-byte alignment When RB_FORCE_8BYTE_ALIGNMENT is true, rb_calculate_event_length() reserves the space of event->array[0] for placing the data length and rb_update_event() stores the data length in event->array[0] accordingly. As a result the whole event length will add extra 4 bytes for sizeof(event.array[0]) unconditionally. But ring_buffer_event_length() only subtracts the sizeof(event->array[0]) for events larger than RB_MAX_SMALL_DATA + sizeof(event->array[0]).

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ring-buffer: Fix event length with forced 8-byte alignment When RB_FORCE_8BYTE_ALIGNMENT is true, rb_calculate_event_length() reserves the space of event->array[0] for placing the data length and rb_update_event() stores the data length in event->array[0] accordingly. As a result the whole event length will add extra 4 bytes for sizeof(event.array[0]) unconditionally. But ring_buffer_event_length() only subtracts the sizeof(event->array[0]) for events larger than RB_MAX_SMALL_DATA + sizeof(event->array[0]). As a result, small events on architectures with RB_FORCE_8BYTE_ALIGNMENT=true report a data length that is 4 bytes larger than expected. To fix it, add the RB_FORCE_8BYTE_ALIGNMENT as a condition to subtract the size of that length field whenever RB_FORCE_8BYTE_ALIGNMENT is true. This issue is observed in a riscv64 kernel with CONFIG_HAVE_64BIT_ALIGNED_ACCESS set to y, when we run ftrace selftest trace_marker_raw.tc, we get the weird log: for cases where the id is 1..100, the number of data field is 8*N, but once id exceeds 100, the number of data field becomes 8*N+4: # 1 buf: 58 00 00 00 80 5e d1 63 (number of data field is 8*1) ... # a buf: 58 ... (number of data field is 8*2) ... # 64 buf: 58 ... (number of data field is 8*13) # 65 buf: 58 ... (number of data field is 8*13+4) After applying this change, the number of data field keeps being 8*N+4 consistently.

Affected Software

Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.

VendorProductVersions
LinuxLinux>= 2271048d1b3b0aabf83d25b29c20646dcabedc05, < 7c9f0ccf9f04142458d2ac3d39414f4acae242f0; >= 2271048d1b3b0aabf83d25b29c20646dcabedc05, < 24c3fa71f9947b0e1f3b954db1b769b44140192e; >= 2271048d1b3b0aabf83d25b29c20646dcabedc05, < 14057268e79654c3e8ea2c9b5204cb9644b2964d; >= 2271048d1b3b0aabf83d25b29c20646dcabedc05, < dbcb8635b1eb7603818591cf745c7b1d714f7ac6; >= 2271048d1b3b0aabf83d25b29c20646dcabedc05, < cfada73fabe2ccc06ec77fe2ceaa088689213326; >= 2271048d1b3b0aabf83d25b29c20646dcabedc05, < ec5e96aee75d27779b9a860307679f13f33adb0c; >= 2271048d1b3b0aabf83d25b29c20646dcabedc05, < 3a63a11897c7ba32d1be7a3fdbc48a8b01cf4992; >= 2271048d1b3b0aabf83d25b29c20646dcabedc05, < c37e0a4b79a6bbb96ce5ffe279d7c001e20529e0
LinuxLinux2.6.34

References

Timeline

Published
Last Modified
Status
Received

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-80876?
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ring-buffer: Fix event length with forced 8-byte alignment When RB_FORCE_8BYTE_ALIGNMENT is true, rb_calculate_event_length() reserves the space of event->array[0] for placing the data length and rb_update_event() stores the data length in event->array[0] accordingly. As a result the whole event length will add extra 4 bytes for sizeof(event.array[0]) unconditionally. But ring_buffer_event_length() only subtracts the sizeof(event->array[0]) for events larger than RB_MAX_SMALL_DATA + sizeof(event->array[0]). As a result, small events on architectures with RB_FORCE_8BYTE_ALIGNMENT=true report a data length that is 4 bytes larger than expected. To fix it, add the RB_FORCE_8BYTE_ALIGNMENT as a condition to subtract the size of that length field whenever RB_FORCE_8BYTE_ALIGNMENT is true. This issue is observed in a riscv64 kernel with CONFIG_HAVE_64BIT_ALIGNED_ACCESS set to y, when we run ftrace selftest trace_marker_raw.tc, we get the weird log: for cases where the id is 1..100, the number of data field is 8*N, but once id exceeds 100, the number of data field becomes 8*N+4: # 1 buf: 58 00 00 00 80 5e d1 63 (number of data field is 8*1) ... # a buf: 58 ... (number of data field is 8*2) ... # 64 buf: 58 ... (number of data field is 8*13) # 65 buf: 58 ... (number of data field is 8*13+4) After applying this change, the number of data field keeps being 8*N+4 consistently.
How severe is CVE-2026-80876?
Severity scoring for CVE-2026-80876 is pending analysis.
How do I fix CVE-2026-80876?
Check the vendor references and advisories linked above for patched versions and mitigation guidance. You can also run a Strix scan to test if your systems are affected.

How Strix Helps

Related CVEs from 2026

View all 2026CVEs →

Are you affected by CVE-2026-80876?

Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.

Scan your code now

Source: NVD / NIST