CVE-2026-85033
Last modified
CVE-2026-85033 is a medium-severity vulnerability rated 4.6/10 on the CVSS scale. The AVRCP Target role in subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/avrcp.c keeps its vendor-dependent response transmit state in a per-connection object selected by connection index (get_avrcp_tg()), with the per-transfer context (tid, sent_len, and the BT_AVRCP_TG_FLAG_TX_ONGOING flag) stored in the user_data of the queued response net_buf. The AVCTP teardown handler avrcp_disconnected() did not cancel tg->vd_rsp_tx_work and did not release the buffers still queued on tg->vd_rsp_tx_pending, so a link drop in the middle of a fragmented response left the buffer on the list with TX_ONGOING still set. A remote AVRCP Controller can trigger this deterministically: it issues a vendor-dependent command whose response exceeds one AVRCP fragment (for example GetElementAttributes or GetCapabilities), lets bt_avrcp_tg_vendor_tx_work() emit the START fragment, and then drops the ACL link instead of sending REQUEST_CONTINUING_RESPONSE.
Description
The AVRCP Target role in subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/avrcp.c keeps its vendor-dependent response transmit state in a per-connection object selected by connection index (get_avrcp_tg()), with the per-transfer context (tid, sent_len, and the BT_AVRCP_TG_FLAG_TX_ONGOING flag) stored in the user_data of the queued response net_buf. The AVCTP teardown handler avrcp_disconnected() did not cancel tg->vd_rsp_tx_work and did not release the buffers still queued on tg->vd_rsp_tx_pending, so a link drop in the middle of a fragmented response left the buffer on the list with TX_ONGOING still set. A remote AVRCP Controller can trigger this deterministically: it issues a vendor-dependent command whose response exceeds one AVRCP fragment (for example GetElementAttributes or GetCapabilities), lets bt_avrcp_tg_vendor_tx_work() emit the START fragment, and then drops the ACL link instead of sending REQUEST_CONTINUING_RESPONSE. The AVCTP control channel requires an encrypted BR/EDR link (BT_SECURITY_L2), so the attacker must be a paired peer within radio range; no user interaction is needed. Because the Target objects are static and reused, the next connection landing on the same connection index finds the stale buffer at the head of vd_rsp_tx_pending. Every run of the TX work sees TX_ONGOING and returns immediately, so all further vendor-dependent responses queue behind the stale head and are never sent — a persistent loss of AVRCP Target function that no timeout clears and only a reboot recovers. Each cycle also leaks one response buffer from a shallow application pool, and a new peer that sends REQUEST_CONTINUING_RESPONSE clears the stale TX_ONGOING via bt_avrcp_tg_process_continuing_cmd(), causing the un-sent remainder of the previous peer's response to be transmitted to it. The fix cancels tg->vd_rsp_tx_work and unrefs every buffer on tg->vd_rsp_tx_pending in avrcp_disconnected(); since the TX context lives in the buffer user_data, releasing the buffers also resets the TX state machine. There is no memory corruption: the pre-fix buffer is leaked with a live reference, so no use-after-free arises.
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| zephyrproject | zephyr | >= 4.4.0, < 4.5.0 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Awaiting Analysis
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-85033?
How severe is CVE-2026-85033?
How do I fix CVE-2026-85033?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-85028Creation of a temporary file in a directory with insecure pe…7.8
- CVE-2026-85029IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attac…8.8
- CVE-2026-8503Apache::Session::Generate::SHA256 versions before 1.3.19 for…6.5
- CVE-2026-85030A vulnerability has been found in HKUDS AI-Trader up to d03f…3.7
- CVE-2026-85031A vulnerability was found in TOTOLINK CP450 4.1.0. The impac…9.9
- CVE-2026-85032The MCTP over USB device class in subsys/pmci/mctp/mctp_usb.…4.8
- CVE-2026-85034The Bluetooth host's GATT client passed the value of a recei…6.7
- CVE-2026-85035The can_add_rx_filter_msgq() system call installs a CAN RX f…8.8
- CVE-2026-85036The Bluetooth Classic AVDTP layer defers releasing a session…5.7
- CVE-2026-85037The Sunshine Photo Cart WordPress plugin before 3.7 does no…5.3
- CVE-2026-85038The B2BKing — Ultimate WooCommerce B2B and Wholesale Plugin …5.3
- CVE-2026-85040A weakness has been identified in ZhongBangKeJi CRMEB up to …4.7
Are you affected by CVE-2026-85033?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
