CVE-2026-87858
Last modified
CVE-2026-87858 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 7.2/10 on the CVSS scale. Temporal Server decided whether a Workflow completion callback was internal by reading a caller-supplied HTTP header. An authenticated caller holding only write permission in a single namespace could attach a completion callback whose URL host matched the configured callback address allowlist, whose URL path was any Temporal HTTP API route, and whose header map contained a non-empty header named source. EPSS estimates a 0.43% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
Temporal Server decided whether a Workflow completion callback was internal by reading a caller-supplied HTTP header. An authenticated caller holding only write permission in a single namespace could attach a completion callback whose URL host matched the configured callback address allowlist, whose URL path was any Temporal HTTP API route, and whose header map contained a non-empty header named source. When the History service delivered that callback, the non-empty source header caused it to re-target the request at the local frontend client and rewrite only the scheme and host, preserving the caller's path, query, and request body. Where an internal frontend is deployed with its HTTP API enabled, that client resolves to the internal frontend, which authorizes every request as a system administrator without requiring authentication information. The result is that the server performs an attacker-chosen state-changing HTTP POST against its own administrative API on the caller's behalf, in namespaces where the caller has no permission. The caller never needs network access to the internal frontend, because the History service makes the request. Confirmed effects include terminating Workflows in other namespaces, registering namespaces, modifying another namespace's configuration, and deleting another namespace and its Workflows. The affected routing logic is present in both the HSM and CHASM callback delivery implementations. This description and the CVSS score in this record describe releases 1.30.0 and later, where any non-empty source header is sufficient. Releases 1.25.0 through 1.29.7 are affected by a narrower form of the same defect in which the header must exactly match a configured cluster ID, a UUID that a namespace-scoped caller cannot read through the API. The consequence once that match occurs is the same, but the attack is materially harder and scores lower. To determine whether a deployment is affected, check two settings together: the static Server configuration for a non-zero services.internal-frontend.rpc.httpPort, and the effective per-namespace dynamic configuration value of component.callbacks.allowedAddresses. A deployment is exposed only when an internal frontend is deployed with a non-zero HTTP port, at least one allowlist rule admits a host, and authorization is enabled. The allowlist is empty by default, which denies all external callback URLs, and the stock static topology does not include an internal frontend. Note that a failed attach returns the error 'invalid url: url does not match any configured callback address', which proves only that one tested URL did not match and does not prove the effective allowlist is empty. To look for callbacks already attached, use DescribeWorkflowExecution, which returns callback information for a Workflow's registered completion callbacks. Operators should be aware of a gap when searching for evidence of delivery: the frontend HTTP API server records the request method and URL at debug level only, so at default log levels a delivered request is not written to the internal frontend's logs, and the absence of such log entries is not evidence that the issue was not exploited.
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Temporal Technologies, Inc. | Temporal Server | >= 1.30.0, < 1.30.7; >= 1.31.0, < 1.31.3 |
| Temporal Technologies, Inc. | Temporal Server | >= 1.25.0, <= 1.29.7 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Awaiting Analysis
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-87858?
How severe is CVE-2026-87858?
How do I fix CVE-2026-87858?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-87840The Tripzzy WordPress plugin before 1.5.1 does not perform …5.3
- CVE-2026-87842The Zonify WordPress plugin before 1.0.5 does not perform a…7.5
- CVE-2026-87848The MPCX Lightbox WordPress plugin 1.2.2 through 1.2.5 does …3.7
- CVE-2026-8785A flaw has been found in projectworlds hospital-management-s…7.3
- CVE-2026-87853A flaw was found in SSSD's IdP authentication provider. The …7.5
- CVE-2026-87854The Subscriptions for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.…5.3
- CVE-2026-87859morgan is an HTTP request logger middleware for Node.js. In …5.3
- CVE-2026-8786A vulnerability has been found in Tencent WeKnora up to 0.3.…6.3
- CVE-2026-87860The Subscriptions for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.…4.3
- CVE-2026-8787The Firebase Support & Chat Management plugin for WordPress …8.8
- CVE-2026-87870The Ninja Forms - Scheduled Exports plugin for WordPress is …6.4
- CVE-2026-87872A flaw was found in the OCAPI modules (ocapi_command, ocapi_…6.8
Are you affected by CVE-2026-87858?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
