CVE-2026-89985
Last modified
CVE-2026-89985 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 7.8/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: memcg: keep folio's objcg same as its node memcg_reparent_objcgs() has an inherent assumption that a folio's objcg is the objcg of the folio's node. Folio migration across nodes breaks that assumption: the new folio simply inherits the old folio's objcg while living on a different node. Once the assumption is broken, the reparenting of the folio's objcg and the reparenting of the folio's LRU list are no longer atomic.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: memcg: keep folio's objcg same as its node memcg_reparent_objcgs() has an inherent assumption that a folio's objcg is the objcg of the folio's node. Folio migration across nodes breaks that assumption: the new folio simply inherits the old folio's objcg while living on a different node. Once the assumption is broken, the reparenting of the folio's objcg and the reparenting of the folio's LRU list are no longer atomic. memcg_reparent_objcgs() handles one node per iteration and drops all the locks in between, so the objcg gets reparented in the iteration for the objcg's node while the LRU list gets spliced in the iteration for the folio's node. Any LRU operation on that folio in between resolves its lruvec through the objcg, and thus takes the lru_lock of the wrong memcg, not the lru_lock of the list the folio is actually on. Fix this by selecting the objcg by folio_nid() at charge time, and by re-deriving it for the destination node in mem_cgroup_migrate() and mem_cgroup_replace_folio().
Metrics
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= f1cf8d2f36dc369688bbe61ce064fbd829dbc9e1, < 6165478eaa3094eaee1d5e33b12520064faf043d; >= f1cf8d2f36dc369688bbe61ce064fbd829dbc9e1, < bf4ade7dbd76d4ec8697840e4ebb15ed77c5ec26 |
| Linux | Linux | 7.1 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-89985?
How severe is CVE-2026-89985?
How do I fix CVE-2026-89985?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-89979In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-89980In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.4
- CVE-2026-89981In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-89982In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-89983In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-89984In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-89986In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-89987In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-89988In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-89989In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-89990In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…9.8
- CVE-2026-89991In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
Are you affected by CVE-2026-89985?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
