CVE-2026-90342
Last modified
CVE-2026-90342 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix mmap_lock deadlock on arena lock failure Reported by the Sashiko AI review. arena_vm_fault() returns VM_FAULT_RETRY when it can't take arena->spinlock, but it never took mmap_lock. The fault path assumes a VM_FAULT_RETRY handler already dropped mmap_lock and re-takes it on the retry, so mmap_lock gets taken twice and can deadlock: do_user_addr_fault() { fault = handle_mm_fault(...); // calls arena_vm_fault() if (fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY) goto retry; // re-locks mmap_lock mmap_read_unlock(mm); } Return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS instead, for two reasons: 1.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix mmap_lock deadlock on arena lock failure Reported by the Sashiko AI review. arena_vm_fault() returns VM_FAULT_RETRY when it can't take arena->spinlock, but it never took mmap_lock. The fault path assumes a VM_FAULT_RETRY handler already dropped mmap_lock and re-takes it on the retry, so mmap_lock gets taken twice and can deadlock: do_user_addr_fault() { fault = handle_mm_fault(...); // calls arena_vm_fault() if (fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY) goto retry; // re-locks mmap_lock mmap_read_unlock(mm); } Return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS instead, for two reasons: 1. We could keep VM_FAULT_RETRY, but then we'd have to drop the fault lock first and cap the retry ourselves, the way __folio_lock_or_retry() does. 2. A failed raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave() already means a possible deadlock was detected, so retrying just hits the same lock again. So returning VM_FAULT_RETRY here is overkill.
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= b8467290edab4bafae352bf3f317055669a1a458, < af8087f16714f7620c4db3e732baaa1b2337948f; >= b8467290edab4bafae352bf3f317055669a1a458, < 0b10b945479c954393d62ee3229d2f224a4ca91c |
| Linux | Linux | 7.0 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-90342?
How severe is CVE-2026-90342?
How do I fix CVE-2026-90342?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-90337In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-90338In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-90339In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-9034Use After Free vulnerability in Arm Ltd Bifrost GPU Userspac…7.8
- CVE-2026-90340In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-90341In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.7
- CVE-2026-90343In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-90344In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-90345In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-90346In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-90347In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.4
- CVE-2026-90348In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
Are you affected by CVE-2026-90342?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
