CVE-2026-90648
Last modified
CVE-2026-90648 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 7.1/10 on the CVSS scale. wasm2c in WebAssembly wabt through 1.0.41 allows sandbox escape in some situations that primarily involve 32-bit platforms, aka a "table flip" attack. It does not check the return value of calloc() in wasm_rt_allocate_funcref_table() (wasm2c/wasm-rt-impl-tableops.inc).
Description
wasm2c in WebAssembly wabt through 1.0.41 allows sandbox escape in some situations that primarily involve 32-bit platforms, aka a "table flip" attack. It does not check the return value of calloc() in wasm_rt_allocate_funcref_table() (wasm2c/wasm-rt-impl-tableops.inc). When the funcref table allocation fails, table->data is left NULL while table->size keeps the guest-declared element count; thus, bounds checks still pass and table element accesses resolve to absolute memory addresses (i * sizeof(wasm_rt_funcref_t)). This gives arbitrary read and write of host process memory and - via table.get, table.set, and call_indirect - arbitrary code execution, defeating the isolation that wasm2c exists to provide (a full sandbox escape). wasm2c is used as an in-process sandboxing boundary by RLBox and WasmBoxC, including in Firefox, which compiles the Graphite, Hunspell, Ogg, Expat, and Woff2 libraries via wasm2c to contain untrusted font, media, and XML input. Therefore, sandboxing in these applications is potentially affected. Exploitation requires the funcref table allocation to fail, for example under an address-space limit (RLIMIT_AS), on 32-bit hosts, with vm.overcommit_memory=2, or under memory pressure. On 64-bit Linux with default overcommit the allocation succeeds and the defect is not triggered. The wasm2c memory allocator aborts on calloc failure in the same runtime; the table allocator lacks this abort behavior. This was introduced in commit ab9e0b55 (PR #813).
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| WebAssembly | wabt | <= 1.0.41 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-90648?
How severe is CVE-2026-90648?
How do I fix CVE-2026-90648?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-90606A security vulnerability has been detected in Totolink A3002…9.9
- CVE-2026-9061The Store Locator WordPress plugin before 1.6.9 does not san…3.5
- CVE-2026-90616In Flatpak before 1.18.1, a malicious sandboxed app can obta…7.4
- CVE-2026-9062The Store Locator WordPress plugin before 1.6.9 does not val…3.4
- CVE-2026-9064A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. The get_ldapmessage_control…7.5
- CVE-2026-90647ASE/Kalkitech ASE2000 V2 Communication Test Set 2.35 through…7.4
- CVE-2026-9065SureCart version prior to 4.2.1 are vulnerable to authentica…9.3
- CVE-2026-90651Socket Firewall (socketdev/socket-registry-firewall) in regi…8.1
- CVE-2026-9066The WP Compress WordPress plugin before 7.10.04 does not va…6.1
- CVE-2026-90668The webserver in UnrealIRCd 6.0.5 through 6.2.6 before 6.2.7…7.5
- CVE-2026-9067The Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP WordPress plugin b…9.1
- CVE-2026-90678An issue was discovered in HAProxy 3.3.0 through 3.4.4 and i…7.5
Are you affected by CVE-2026-90648?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
