CVE-2026-93231
Last modified
CVE-2026-93231 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: lockd: fix swapped arguments in nlmsvc_match_ip() When releasing locks by server IP address via /proc/fs/nfsd/unlock_ip, nlmsvc_unlock_all_by_ip() calls nlm_traverse_files() with the server sockaddr as the opaque @data argument: nlm_traverse_files(server_addr, nlmsvc_match_ip, NULL); The match callback is later invoked from nlm_traverse_locks() as: match(lockhost, host); where the first argument is the nlm_host that owns the lock, and the second argument is the @data that was originally passed down (here the server sockaddr). This is the convention every other match callback relies on (nlmsvc_mark_host(), nlmsvc_same_host(), nlmsvc_is_client()): arg1 is the real nlm_host, arg2 is the caller-supplied reference value. nlmsvc_match_ip() has had these two arguments reversed ever since the unlock-by-IP feature was introduced in commit 4373ea84c84d ("lockd: unlock lockd locks associated with a given server ip"): return rpc_cmp_addr(nlm_srcaddr(host), datap); Here @host is actually the server sockaddr, so nlm_srcaddr(host) dereferences a struct sockaddr as a struct nlm_host and reads garbage at the offset of h_srcaddr; meanwhile @datap is actually the lock owner's nlm_host but is compared as a sockaddr.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: lockd: fix swapped arguments in nlmsvc_match_ip() When releasing locks by server IP address via /proc/fs/nfsd/unlock_ip, nlmsvc_unlock_all_by_ip() calls nlm_traverse_files() with the server sockaddr as the opaque @data argument: nlm_traverse_files(server_addr, nlmsvc_match_ip, NULL); The match callback is later invoked from nlm_traverse_locks() as: match(lockhost, host); where the first argument is the nlm_host that owns the lock, and the second argument is the @data that was originally passed down (here the server sockaddr). This is the convention every other match callback relies on (nlmsvc_mark_host(), nlmsvc_same_host(), nlmsvc_is_client()): arg1 is the real nlm_host, arg2 is the caller-supplied reference value. nlmsvc_match_ip() has had these two arguments reversed ever since the unlock-by-IP feature was introduced in commit 4373ea84c84d ("lockd: unlock lockd locks associated with a given server ip"): return rpc_cmp_addr(nlm_srcaddr(host), datap); Here @host is actually the server sockaddr, so nlm_srcaddr(host) dereferences a struct sockaddr as a struct nlm_host and reads garbage at the offset of h_srcaddr; meanwhile @datap is actually the lock owner's nlm_host but is compared as a sockaddr. As a result the comparison practically never matches and locks are not released for the requested IP. Swap the arguments so the lock owner's source address is compared against the requested server address: return rpc_cmp_addr(nlm_srcaddr(datap), (struct sockaddr *)host); [ cel: fix the misleading typedef parameter names too ]
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= 4373ea84c84d8a96e99d3da99e813d3e36d1bd11, < 0d72e78c9d38d5377a059a4837f82b65b91cdcf6; >= 4373ea84c84d8a96e99d3da99e813d3e36d1bd11, < 21bcb609e0ab1dd60f39ca3498f85808933bcc9f; >= 4373ea84c84d8a96e99d3da99e813d3e36d1bd11, < b9060689f49dc663e9a3d069c4a65ff63a836e66 |
| Linux | Linux | 2.6.26 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-93231?
How severe is CVE-2026-93231?
How do I fix CVE-2026-93231?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-93226In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93227In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93228In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93229In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-9323The urwid web display backend (urwid/display/web.py) generat…8.1
- CVE-2026-93230In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93232In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93233In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93234In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93235In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93236In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93237In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
Are you affected by CVE-2026-93231?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
