CVE-2026-93784
Last modified
CVE-2026-93784 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: cfg80211: validate IEs in cfg80211_wext_siwgenie() The KASAN allocation trace shows that a malformed IE buffer is stored via SIOCSIWGENIE (cfg80211_wext_siwgenie()) without any validation. The crash trace shows that a subsequent SIOCSIWESSID triggers a connection attempt which calls cfg80211_sme_get_conn_ies() to process the stored IE buffer, causing: - An out-of-bounds read in skip_ie() which reads ies[pos+1] (the length byte) past the end of the 1-byte buffer. - An integer underflow in the memcpy size argument when offs returned by ieee80211_ie_split() exceeds ies_len, causing unsigned subtraction to wrap to SIZE_MAX and triggering a fortify panic. Fix this by validating the IE buffer in cfg80211_wext_siwgenie() before storing it. [drop unnecessary ie_len check, update commit message].
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: cfg80211: validate IEs in cfg80211_wext_siwgenie() The KASAN allocation trace shows that a malformed IE buffer is stored via SIOCSIWGENIE (cfg80211_wext_siwgenie()) without any validation. The crash trace shows that a subsequent SIOCSIWESSID triggers a connection attempt which calls cfg80211_sme_get_conn_ies() to process the stored IE buffer, causing: - An out-of-bounds read in skip_ie() which reads ies[pos+1] (the length byte) past the end of the 1-byte buffer. - An integer underflow in the memcpy size argument when offs returned by ieee80211_ie_split() exceeds ies_len, causing unsigned subtraction to wrap to SIZE_MAX and triggering a fortify panic. Fix this by validating the IE buffer in cfg80211_wext_siwgenie() before storing it. [drop unnecessary ie_len check, update commit message]
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= f21293549f60f88c74fcb9944737f11048896dc4, < c970879e03b23a27df42caf7ba506485a165fb96; >= f21293549f60f88c74fcb9944737f11048896dc4, < 01cc395cecfaa73134d39fb9a401d9605d8bb2c5; >= f21293549f60f88c74fcb9944737f11048896dc4, < a2f5286ca4f304d3fd469f01b96b518608912a5c |
| Linux | Linux | 2.6.32 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-93784?
How severe is CVE-2026-93784?
How do I fix CVE-2026-93784?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-93774Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in WP Photo Album…7.1
- CVE-2026-93778The WP Yelp Review Slider plugin for WordPress is vulnerable…7.2
- CVE-2026-9378A security flaw has been discovered in Edimax BR-6675nD 1.12…6.3
- CVE-2026-93781In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93782In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-93783In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93785In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93786In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.1
- CVE-2026-93787In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.1
- CVE-2026-93788In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93789In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-9379A weakness has been identified in Edimax BR-6675nD 1.12. Thi…6.3
Are you affected by CVE-2026-93784?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
