CVE-2026-93824
Last modified
CVE-2026-93824 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: reject the combination of TLS and sockmap TLS and sockmap (BPF psock) integration hides a lot of latent bugs. Bugs which may be more or less relevant for real users but they are definitely exploitable. We could not find anyone actively using this integration so let's reject this config. Adding a TLS socket to a sockmap was already rejected by sk_psock_init() through the inet_csk_has_ulp() check. We need to reject the attempts to configure the TLS keys (rather than adding the ULP itself) because checking prior to the ULP installation is tricky without risking a race with sockmap getting added in parallel (sockmap does not hold the socket lock). This patch is a minimal rejection of the feature.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: reject the combination of TLS and sockmap TLS and sockmap (BPF psock) integration hides a lot of latent bugs. Bugs which may be more or less relevant for real users but they are definitely exploitable. We could not find anyone actively using this integration so let's reject this config. Adding a TLS socket to a sockmap was already rejected by sk_psock_init() through the inet_csk_has_ulp() check. We need to reject the attempts to configure the TLS keys (rather than adding the ULP itself) because checking prior to the ULP installation is tricky without risking a race with sockmap getting added in parallel (sockmap does not hold the socket lock). This patch is a minimal rejection of the feature. Subsequent patch in the series will do a light dead code removal. Full cleanup would require a major rewrite of the Tx path, we don't need skmsg any more.
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= d3b18ad31f93d0b6bae105c679018a1ba7daa9ca, < c3d4d537337f69e405a36fa561e7292ee4148bf7; >= d3b18ad31f93d0b6bae105c679018a1ba7daa9ca, < a08e780b6cc1153cbff8be55de9ec9da809e344f; >= d3b18ad31f93d0b6bae105c679018a1ba7daa9ca, < 460e6486617c17dd19abe8f3fc67d9a6fa25f8ca |
| Linux | Linux | 4.20 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-93824?
How severe is CVE-2026-93824?
How do I fix CVE-2026-93824?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-93819In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-9382A flaw has been found in Edimax BR-6675nD 1.12. Affected by …8.8
- CVE-2026-93820In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93821In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93822In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93823In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93825In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93826In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.5
- CVE-2026-93827In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.4
- CVE-2026-93828In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-93829In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-9383A vulnerability has been found in itsourcecode Electronic Ju…7.3
Are you affected by CVE-2026-93824?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
