CVE-2026-95108
Last modified
CVE-2026-95108 is a medium-severity vulnerability rated 6.8/10 on the CVSS scale. One logical thread of a user-mode ThreadX module costs the Module Manager's shared object pool two allocations, not one. The module asks for a `TX_THREAD` control block through `txm_module_object_allocate`; `_txm_module_manager_thread_create` then takes a second allocation of `TXM_MODULE_KERNEL_STACK_SIZE` bytes for the privileged kernel stack that thread's system calls run on, and records it in the control block.
Description
One logical thread of a user-mode ThreadX module costs the Module Manager's shared object pool two allocations, not one. The module asks for a `TX_THREAD` control block through `txm_module_object_allocate`; `_txm_module_manager_thread_create` then takes a second allocation of `TXM_MODULE_KERNEL_STACK_SIZE` bytes for the privileged kernel stack that thread's system calls run on, and records it in the control block. Both come from `_txm_module_manager_object_pool` and both are linked onto the module's allocation list. The Module Manager's thread-delete dispatcher released only the first. The kernel stack stayed allocated until the whole module was stopped, so a module that creates, terminates and deletes threads in a loop — every state transition valid, every service returning `TX_SUCCESS` — removed a fixed block from a finite pool shared by the manager and by every other loaded module, on every cycle, for as long as it stayed loaded. Once the pool is exhausted, no memory-protected module can create any kernel object and no user-mode module thread can be created anywhere in the system. Vulnerable function: `_txm_module_manager_tx_thread_delete_dispatch`, in `common_modules/module_manager/inc/txm_module_manager_dispatch.h`.
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Eclipse Foundation | Eclipse ThreadX | >= 6.0.1, <= 6.5.1.202602a |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Awaiting Analysis
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-95108?
How severe is CVE-2026-95108?
How do I fix CVE-2026-95108?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-95101Description NGINX Plus and NGINX Open Source have a vulnerab…5.3
- CVE-2026-95102WebSocket endpoints lack proper authentication mechanisms, e…9.4
- CVE-2026-95104Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in BUFFALO …7.5
- CVE-2026-95105Reliance on Obfuscation or Encryption of Security-Relevant I…8.2
- CVE-2026-95106Gitea accepted pushed Git trees containing two entries with …9.1
- CVE-2026-95107A ThreadX module chooses `object_size` when it calls `txm_mo…7
- CVE-2026-95109The Cortex-A7 MMU Modules port validates a caller-supplied b…8.5
- CVE-2026-9511A vulnerability was identified in Totolink CA750-PoE 6.2c.51…6.3
- CVE-2026-95111A memory-protected ThreadX module's queue request reaches th…4.8
- CVE-2026-95112When processing issue and comment bodies, Gitea scanned the …6.5
- CVE-2026-95114libwebsockets contains an out-of-bounds read vulnerability i…7.5
- CVE-2026-95115Buffer Overflow vulnerability in libwebsockets main 106d542c…7.5
Are you affected by CVE-2026-95108?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
