Strix
64.7K

CVE-2026-97424

Unknown

Last modified

CVE-2026-97424 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu/ras: add ras_suspend callback and use it for cp_ecc_error_irq cp_ecc_error_irq is acquired in amdgpu_gfx_ras_late_init() but released in gfx_v9_0_hw_fini(), so the put site has to query amdgpu_irq_enabled() because the get is skipped on SR-IOV VF. ras_late_init / ras_fini have no suspend counterpart, so move the put to amdgpu_gfx_ras_suspend() / amdgpu_gfx_ras_fini() and add a matching ras_suspend callback that is invoked from amdgpu_ras_suspend() before disable_all_features(). The get and put now sit in the same place and check the same condition (not VF, funcs registered), no refcount querying needed. An active flag gates ras_fini so the suspend-then-unload-without-resume path falls into amdgpu_ras_block_late_fini_default() instead of double-releasing what ras_suspend already cleaned up. Drop the cp_ecc_error_irq put from gfx_v9_0_hw_fini().

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu/ras: add ras_suspend callback and use it for cp_ecc_error_irq cp_ecc_error_irq is acquired in amdgpu_gfx_ras_late_init() but released in gfx_v9_0_hw_fini(), so the put site has to query amdgpu_irq_enabled() because the get is skipped on SR-IOV VF. ras_late_init / ras_fini have no suspend counterpart, so move the put to amdgpu_gfx_ras_suspend() / amdgpu_gfx_ras_fini() and add a matching ras_suspend callback that is invoked from amdgpu_ras_suspend() before disable_all_features(). The get and put now sit in the same place and check the same condition (not VF, funcs registered), no refcount querying needed. An active flag gates ras_fini so the suspend-then-unload-without-resume path falls into amdgpu_ras_block_late_fini_default() instead of double-releasing what ras_suspend already cleaned up. Drop the cp_ecc_error_irq put from gfx_v9_0_hw_fini(). gfx_v8_0 manages cp_ecc_error_irq locally and is unaffected; no other GFX generation has this IRQ.

Affected Software

Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.

VendorProductVersions
LinuxLinux>= 760a1d55344d823287850466db893ed77e948803, < 001824103f2fe6ffd2380afddf81f43b446035b2; >= 760a1d55344d823287850466db893ed77e948803, < e3829992dd9fa0a82511af4f01733fc854cd15a5
LinuxLinux5.2

References

Timeline

Published
Last Modified
Status
Received

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-97424?
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu/ras: add ras_suspend callback and use it for cp_ecc_error_irq cp_ecc_error_irq is acquired in amdgpu_gfx_ras_late_init() but released in gfx_v9_0_hw_fini(), so the put site has to query amdgpu_irq_enabled() because the get is skipped on SR-IOV VF. ras_late_init / ras_fini have no suspend counterpart, so move the put to amdgpu_gfx_ras_suspend() / amdgpu_gfx_ras_fini() and add a matching ras_suspend callback that is invoked from amdgpu_ras_suspend() before disable_all_features(). The get and put now sit in the same place and check the same condition (not VF, funcs registered), no refcount querying needed. An active flag gates ras_fini so the suspend-then-unload-without-resume path falls into amdgpu_ras_block_late_fini_default() instead of double-releasing what ras_suspend already cleaned up. Drop the cp_ecc_error_irq put from gfx_v9_0_hw_fini(). gfx_v8_0 manages cp_ecc_error_irq locally and is unaffected; no other GFX generation has this IRQ.
How severe is CVE-2026-97424?
Severity scoring for CVE-2026-97424 is pending analysis.
How do I fix CVE-2026-97424?
Check the vendor references and advisories linked above for patched versions and mitigation guidance. You can also run a Strix scan to test if your systems are affected.

How Strix Helps

Related CVEs from 2026

View all 2026CVEs →

Are you affected by CVE-2026-97424?

Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.

Scan your code now

Source: NVD / NIST